Skip to main page content
Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation

Search Page

My NCBI Filters
Results by year

Table representation of search results timeline featuring number of search results per year.

Year Number of Results
1946 1
1947 1
1948 1
1949 2
1950 7
1951 10
1952 13
1953 16
1954 16
1955 15
1956 13
1957 21
1958 23
1959 22
1960 25
1961 17
1962 14
1963 16
1964 32
1965 22
1966 34
1967 52
1968 52
1969 62
1970 39
1971 48
1972 37
1973 51
1974 39
1975 101
1976 109
1977 106
1978 95
1979 72
1980 90
1981 78
1982 74
1983 85
1984 77
1985 80
1986 68
1987 59
1988 56
1989 79
1990 75
1991 81
1992 67
1993 93
1994 58
1995 57
1996 58
1997 67
1998 49
1999 48
2000 49
2001 40
2002 42
2003 40
2004 30
2005 30
2006 34
2007 35
2008 31
2009 21
2010 26
2011 43
2012 20
2013 28
2014 25
2015 21
2016 28
2017 22
2018 19
2019 18
2020 11
Text availability
Article attribute
Article type
Publication date

Search Results

3,137 results
Results by year
Filters applied: . Clear all
Page 1
Importance of software version for measurement of arterial stiffness: Arteriograph as an example.
Ring M, Eriksson MJ, Nyberg G, Caidahl K. Ring M, et al. PLoS One. 2018 May 21;13(5):e0197019. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0197019. eCollection 2018. PLoS One. 2018. PMID: 29782517 Free PMC article.
., the Arteriograph and SphygmoCor. A new version of the software for the Arteriograph (v. 3.0.0.1, TensioMed, Budapest, Hungary; Arteriograph II) is now available. ...Estimated PWVao and AIxao were measured by both Arteriograph and SphygmoCor. We comp …
., the Arteriograph and SphygmoCor. A new version of the software for the Arteriograph (v. 3.0.0.1, TensioMed, Budapest, Hunga …
Pulse wave analysis using the Mobil-O-Graph, Arteriograph and Complior device: a comparative study.
Benas D, Kornelakis M, Triantafyllidi H, Kostelli G, Pavlidis G, Varoudi M, Vlastos D, Lambadiari V, Parissis J, Ikonomidis I. Benas D, et al. Blood Press. 2019 Apr;28(2):107-113. doi: 10.1080/08037051.2018.1564236. Epub 2019 Jan 22. Blood Press. 2019. PMID: 30668163
We compared Arteriograph and Complior devices with the Mobil-O-Graph for assessment of PWV and central systolic blood pressure (cSBP). ...ICC for PWV was 0.86 between Arteriograph and Mobil-O-Graph, 0.87 between Complior and Mobil-O-Graph and for cSBP 0.92 and 0.91 …
We compared Arteriograph and Complior devices with the Mobil-O-Graph for assessment of PWV and central systolic blood pressure (cSBP) …
Invasive validation of arteriograph estimates of central blood pressure in patients with type 2 diabetes.
Rossen NB, Laugesen E, Peters CD, Ebbehøj E, Knudsen ST, Poulsen PL, Bøtker HE, Hansen KW. Rossen NB, et al. Am J Hypertens. 2014 May;27(5):674-9. doi: 10.1093/ajh/hpt162. Epub 2013 Aug 31. Am J Hypertens. 2014. PMID: 23996499 Clinical Trial.
RESULTS: The difference (invasively measured BP minus Arteriograph-estimated BP) in central systolic BP (SBP) was 4.4±8.7 mm Hg (P = 0.03). ...CONCLUSIONS: Compared with invasively measured central SBP, we found a systematic underestimation by the Arteriograph. Howe …
RESULTS: The difference (invasively measured BP minus Arteriograph-estimated BP) in central systolic BP (SBP) was 4.4±8.7 mm Hg (P = …
Measurement of central augmentation index by three different methods and techniques: Agreement among Arteriograph, Complior, and Mobil-O-Graph devices.
Papaioannou TG, Thymis J, Benas D, Triantafyllidi H, Kostelli G, Pavlidis G, Kousathana F, Katogiannis K, Vlastos D, Lambadiari V, Papadavid E, Parissis J, Tousoulis D, Ikonomidis I. Papaioannou TG, et al. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2019 Sep;21(9):1386-1392. doi: 10.1111/jch.13654. Epub 2019 Aug 29. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2019. PMID: 31465154 Free article.
The aim of this study was to compare AIx measurements performed by the Arteriograph, Complior, and Mobil-O-Graph apparatuses. ...Mean difference (bias) ± one standard deviation of difference (with limits of agreement) of AIx between different devices was as follows: (a) Mo …
The aim of this study was to compare AIx measurements performed by the Arteriograph, Complior, and Mobil-O-Graph apparatuses. ...Mean …
The usefulness of a single arm cuff oscillometric method (Arteriograph) to assess changes in central aortic blood pressure and arterial stiffness by antihypertensive treatment: results from the Doxazosin-Ramipril Study.
Jekell A, Kahan T. Jekell A, et al. Blood Press. 2018 Apr;27(2):88-98. doi: 10.1080/08037051.2017.1394791. Epub 2017 Oct 26. Blood Press. 2018. PMID: 29073803
We studied the ability of a single arm cuff oscillometric method (Arteriograph, TensioMed, Hungary) to assess effects of antihypertensive treatment on BP and arterial stiffness. ...We demonstrate the feasibility of the Arteriograph to monitor changes in BP and arter …
We studied the ability of a single arm cuff oscillometric method (Arteriograph, TensioMed, Hungary) to assess effects of antihyperten …
A magnetic resonance perspective of the pulse wave transit time by the Arteriograph device and potential for improving aortic length estimation for central pulse wave velocity.
Rezai MR, Cowan BR, Sherratt N, Finn JD, Wu FC, Cruickshank JK. Rezai MR, et al. Blood Press Monit. 2013 Apr;18(2):111-8. doi: 10.1097/MBP.0b013e32835d3663. Blood Press Monit. 2013. PMID: 23324879
After similar TT corrections for MRI, the Arteriograph-MRI difference in TT reduced to 3.2 ms (95% CI 0.2-6). CONCLUSION: TT estimations by Arteriograph and MRI are close. More accurate length estimation from MRI-derived models improves Arteriograph PWV measu …
After similar TT corrections for MRI, the Arteriograph-MRI difference in TT reduced to 3.2 ms (95% CI 0.2-6). CONCLUSION: TT estimati …
Pulse wave velocity and the non-invasive methods used to assess it: Complior, SphygmoCor, Arteriograph and Vicorder.
Davies JM, Bailey MA, Griffin KJ, Scott DJ. Davies JM, et al. Vascular. 2012 Dec;20(6):342-9. doi: 10.1258/vasc.2011.ra0054. Epub 2012 Sep 7. Vascular. 2012. PMID: 22962046 Review.
We critically evaluated the evidence supporting the four main non-invasive devices available to assess it: Complior, SphygmoCor, Arteriograph and Vicorder. ...The Arteriograph device demonstrated least variance but had poor agreement with the other devices. Undisput …
We critically evaluated the evidence supporting the four main non-invasive devices available to assess it: Complior, SphygmoCor, Arteriog …
Current assessment of pulse wave velocity: comprehensive review of validation studies.
Milan A, Zocaro G, Leone D, Tosello F, Buraioli I, Schiavone D, Veglio F. Milan A, et al. J Hypertens. 2019 Aug;37(8):1547-1557. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000002081. J Hypertens. 2019. PMID: 30882597 Review.
In Arteriograph, MRI, ultrasound and SphygmoCor Xcel validation studies sample size was smaller than the minimum suggested by the guidelines. High discrepancies between devices were shown in distance estimation: in two studies (Arteriograph, Complior) path length wa …
In Arteriograph, MRI, ultrasound and SphygmoCor Xcel validation studies sample size was smaller than the minimum suggested by the gui …
Comparison of pulse wave velocity assessed by three different techniques: Arteriograph, Complior, and Echo-tracking.
Mihalcea DJ, Florescu M, Suran BM, Enescu OA, Mincu RI, Magda S, Patrascu N, Vinereanu D. Mihalcea DJ, et al. Heart Vessels. 2016 Apr;31(4):568-77. doi: 10.1007/s00380-015-0632-x. Epub 2015 Jan 30. Heart Vessels. 2016. PMID: 25633054
Our aim was to compare PWV assessed by 3 different commercially available systems. 100 subjects (51 ± 16 years, 45 men) were evaluated using the 3 methods: an oscillometric technique (Arteriograph, PWV-A); a piezo-electric method (Complior, PWV-C); and an high-resolution u …
Our aim was to compare PWV assessed by 3 different commercially available systems. 100 subjects (51 ± 16 years, 45 men) were evaluated using …
The evaluation of pulse wave velocity using Arteriograph and Complior apparatus across multiple cohorts of cardiovascular-related diseases.
Ikonomidis I, Ntai K, Kadoglou NP, Papadakis I, Kornelakis M, Tritakis V, Varoudi M, Papadima T, Triantafyllidi H, Parissis J, Paraskevaidis I, Lekakis J. Ikonomidis I, et al. Int J Cardiol. 2013 Oct 12;168(5):4890-2. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2013.07.025. Epub 2013 Jul 27. Int J Cardiol. 2013. PMID: 23896538 No abstract available.
3,137 results
Jump to page
Feedback