Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation

Search Page

Filters

My Custom Filters

Results by year

Table representation of search results timeline featuring number of search results per year.

Year Number of Results
2007 1
2008 2
2009 2
2010 2
2011 4
2012 5
2013 16
2014 14
2015 14
2016 11
2017 13
2018 8
2019 10
2020 16
2021 19
2022 14
2023 6
2024 9
2025 6

Publication date

Text availability

Article attribute

Article type

Additional filters

Article Language

Species

Sex

Age

Other

Search Results

142 results

Results by year

Filters applied: Meta-Analysis, Randomized Controlled Trial. Clear all
Page 1
Pembrolizumab plus Axitinib versus Sunitinib for Advanced Renal-Cell Carcinoma.
Rini BI, Plimack ER, Stus V, Gafanov R, Hawkins R, Nosov D, Pouliot F, Alekseev B, Soulières D, Melichar B, Vynnychenko I, Kryzhanivska A, Bondarenko I, Azevedo SJ, Borchiellini D, Szczylik C, Markus M, McDermott RS, Bedke J, Tartas S, Chang YH, Tamada S, Shou Q, Perini RF, Chen M, Atkins MB, Powles T; KEYNOTE-426 Investigators. Rini BI, et al. N Engl J Med. 2019 Mar 21;380(12):1116-1127. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1816714. Epub 2019 Feb 16. N Engl J Med. 2019. PMID: 30779529 Clinical Trial.
BACKGROUND: The combination of pembrolizumab and axitinib showed antitumor activity in a phase 1b trial involving patients with previously untreated advanced renal-cell carcinoma. ...The objective response rate was 59.3% (95% CI, 54.5 to 63.9) in the pembrolizumab-axiti
BACKGROUND: The combination of pembrolizumab and axitinib showed antitumor activity in a phase 1b trial involving patients with previ …
Avelumab plus Axitinib versus Sunitinib for Advanced Renal-Cell Carcinoma.
Motzer RJ, Penkov K, Haanen J, Rini B, Albiges L, Campbell MT, Venugopal B, Kollmannsberger C, Negrier S, Uemura M, Lee JL, Vasiliev A, Miller WH Jr, Gurney H, Schmidinger M, Larkin J, Atkins MB, Bedke J, Alekseev B, Wang J, Mariani M, Robbins PB, Chudnovsky A, Fowst C, Hariharan S, Huang B, di Pietro A, Choueiri TK. Motzer RJ, et al. N Engl J Med. 2019 Mar 21;380(12):1103-1115. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1816047. Epub 2019 Feb 16. N Engl J Med. 2019. PMID: 30779531 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
BACKGROUND: In a single-group, phase 1b trial, avelumab plus axitinib resulted in objective responses in patients with advanced renal-cell carcinoma. This phase 3 trial involving previously untreated patients with advanced renal-cell carcinoma compared avelumab plus axi
BACKGROUND: In a single-group, phase 1b trial, avelumab plus axitinib resulted in objective responses in patients with advanced renal …
Pembrolizumab plus axitinib versus sunitinib monotherapy as first-line treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma (KEYNOTE-426): extended follow-up from a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial.
Powles T, Plimack ER, Soulières D, Waddell T, Stus V, Gafanov R, Nosov D, Pouliot F, Melichar B, Vynnychenko I, Azevedo SJ, Borchiellini D, McDermott RS, Bedke J, Tamada S, Yin L, Chen M, Molife LR, Atkins MB, Rini BI. Powles T, et al. Lancet Oncol. 2020 Dec;21(12):1563-1573. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(20)30436-8. Epub 2020 Oct 23. Lancet Oncol. 2020. PMID: 33284113 Clinical Trial.
BACKGROUND: The first interim analysis of the KEYNOTE-426 study showed superior efficacy of pembrolizumab plus axitinib over sunitinib monotherapy in treatment-naive, advanced renal cell carcinoma. The exploratory analysis with extended follow-up reported here aims to asse …
BACKGROUND: The first interim analysis of the KEYNOTE-426 study showed superior efficacy of pembrolizumab plus axitinib over sunitini …
Toripalimab plus axitinib versus sunitinib as first-line treatment for advanced renal cell carcinoma: RENOTORCH, a randomized, open-label, phase III study.
Yan XQ, Ye MJ, Zou Q, Chen P, He ZS, Wu B, He DL, He CH, Xue XY, Ji ZG, Chen H, Zhang S, Liu YP, Zhang XD, Fu C, Xu DF, Qiu MX, Lv JJ, Huang J, Ren XB, Cheng Y, Qin WJ, Zhang X, Zhou FJ, Ma LL, Guo JM, Ding DG, Wei SZ, He Y, Guo HQ, Shi BK, Liu L, Liu F, Hu ZQ, Jin XM, Yang L, Zhu SX, Liu JH, Huang YH, Xu T, Liu B, Sun T, Wang ZJ, Jiang HW, Yu DX, Zhou AP, Jiang J, Luan GD, Jin CL, Xu J, Hu JX, Huang YR, Guo J, Zhai W, Sheng XN. Yan XQ, et al. Ann Oncol. 2024 Feb;35(2):190-199. doi: 10.1016/j.annonc.2023.09.3108. Epub 2023 Oct 21. Ann Oncol. 2024. PMID: 37872020 Free article. Clinical Trial.

The median PFS was 18.0 months in the toripalimab-axitinib group, whereas it was 9.8 months in the sunitinib group. The IRC-assessed ORR was significantly higher in the toripalimab-axitinib group compared with the sunitinib group (56.7% versus 30.8%; P < 0.0001).

The median PFS was 18.0 months in the toripalimab-axitinib group, whereas it was 9.8 months in the sunitinib group. The IRC-assessed …
Axitinib versus sorafenib as second-line treatment for advanced renal cell carcinoma: overall survival analysis and updated results from a randomised phase 3 trial.
Motzer RJ, Escudier B, Tomczak P, Hutson TE, Michaelson MD, Negrier S, Oudard S, Gore ME, Tarazi J, Hariharan S, Chen C, Rosbrook B, Kim S, Rini BI. Motzer RJ, et al. Lancet Oncol. 2013 May;14(6):552-62. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70093-7. Epub 2013 Apr 16. Lancet Oncol. 2013. PMID: 23598172 Clinical Trial.
BACKGROUND: In a phase 3 trial comparing the efficacy and safety of axitinib versus sorafenib as second-line treatment for metastatic renal cell carcinoma, patients given axitinib had a longer progression-free survival (PFS). ...INTERPRETATION: Although overall surv …
BACKGROUND: In a phase 3 trial comparing the efficacy and safety of axitinib versus sorafenib as second-line treatment for metastatic …
Comparative effectiveness of axitinib versus sorafenib in advanced renal cell carcinoma (AXIS): a randomised phase 3 trial.
Rini BI, Escudier B, Tomczak P, Kaprin A, Szczylik C, Hutson TE, Michaelson MD, Gorbunova VA, Gore ME, Rusakov IG, Negrier S, Ou YC, Castellano D, Lim HY, Uemura H, Tarazi J, Cella D, Chen C, Rosbrook B, Kim S, Motzer RJ. Rini BI, et al. Lancet. 2011 Dec 3;378(9807):1931-9. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61613-9. Epub 2011 Nov 4. Lancet. 2011. PMID: 22056247 Clinical Trial.
FINDINGS: A total of 723 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to receive axitinib (n=361) or sorafenib (n=362). The median PFS was 6.7 months with axitinib compared to 4.7 months with sorafenib (hazard ratio 0.665; 95% CI 0.544-0.812; one-sided p<0.0001). …
FINDINGS: A total of 723 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to receive axitinib (n=361) or sorafenib (n=362). The median PF …
Avelumab plus axitinib versus sunitinib in advanced renal cell carcinoma: biomarker analysis of the phase 3 JAVELIN Renal 101 trial.
Motzer RJ, Robbins PB, Powles T, Albiges L, Haanen JB, Larkin J, Mu XJ, Ching KA, Uemura M, Pal SK, Alekseev B, Gravis G, Campbell MT, Penkov K, Lee JL, Hariharan S, Wang X, Zhang W, Wang J, Chudnovsky A, di Pietro A, Donahue AC, Choueiri TK. Motzer RJ, et al. Nat Med. 2020 Nov;26(11):1733-1741. doi: 10.1038/s41591-020-1044-8. Epub 2020 Sep 7. Nat Med. 2020. PMID: 32895571 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
We report on molecular analyses of baseline tumor samples from the phase 3 JAVELIN Renal 101 trial (n = 886; NCT02684006 ), which demonstrated significantly prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) with first-line avelumab + axitinib versus sunitinib in advanced renal cel …
We report on molecular analyses of baseline tumor samples from the phase 3 JAVELIN Renal 101 trial (n = 886; NCT02684006 ), which demonstrat …
Avelumab + axitinib versus sunitinib as first-line treatment for patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma: final analysis of the phase III JAVELIN Renal 101 trial.
Choueiri TK, Penkov K, Uemura H, Campbell MT, Pal S, Kollmannsberger C, Lee JL, Venugopal B, van den Eertwegh AJM, Negrier S, Gurney H, Albiges L, Berger R, Haanen JBAG, Oyervides Juárez V, Rini BI, Larkin J, Nolè F, Schmidinger M, Atkins MB, Tomita Y, Ellers-Lenz B, Hoffman J, Sandner R, Wang J, di Pietro A, Motzer RJ. Choueiri TK, et al. Ann Oncol. 2025 Apr;36(4):387-392. doi: 10.1016/j.annonc.2024.12.008. Epub 2024 Dec 18. Ann Oncol. 2025. PMID: 39706335 Free article. Clinical Trial.
Investigator-assessed PFS remained prolonged with avelumab + axitinib versus sunitinib [5-year event-free rate in the overall population, 12.0% (95% CI 8.9% to 15.6%) versus 4.4% (95% CI 2.5% to 7.3%)]. ...Avelumab + axitinib provided long-term efficacy benefits ver …
Investigator-assessed PFS remained prolonged with avelumab + axitinib versus sunitinib [5-year event-free rate in the overall populat …
Axitinib, cabozantinib, everolimus, nivolumab, sunitinib and best supportive care in previously treated renal cell carcinoma: a systematic review and economic evaluation.
Edwards SJ, Wakefield V, Cain P, Karner C, Kew K, Bacelar M, Masento N, Salih F. Edwards SJ, et al. Health Technol Assess. 2018 Jan;22(6):1-278. doi: 10.3310/hta22060. Health Technol Assess. 2018. PMID: 29393024 Free PMC article.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of axitinib (Inlyta(), Pfizer Inc., NY, USA), cabozantinib (Cabometyx(), Ipsen, Slough, UK), everolimus (Afinitor(), Novartis, Basel, Switzerland), nivolumab (Opdivo(), Bristol-Myers Squibb, NY, USA), …
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of axitinib (Inlyta(), Pfizer Inc., NY, USA), cabozantinib ( …
The risk of hand-foot skin reaction to axitinib, a novel VEGF inhibitor: a systematic review of literature and meta-analysis.
Fischer A, Wu S, Ho AL, Lacouture ME. Fischer A, et al. Invest New Drugs. 2013 Jun;31(3):787-97. doi: 10.1007/s10637-013-9927-x. Epub 2013 Jan 24. Invest New Drugs. 2013. PMID: 23345001
Axitinib is a potent, selective vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) inhibitor. We have performed a systematic analysis to investigate the risk of hand-foot skin reaction (HFSR) to axitinib and compare the differences in incidences between sorafenib,
Axitinib is a potent, selective vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) inhibitor. We have performed a systematic analysi
142 results