Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation

Search Page

Filters

My Custom Filters

Edit custom filters

Results by year

Table representation of search results timeline featuring number of search results per year.

Year Number of Results
2005 1
2006 1
2008 2
2012 1
2013 2
2014 3
2015 1
2016 2
2017 6
2018 5
2019 5
2020 8
2021 13
2022 2
2023 11
2024 13
2025 25
2026 5

Publication date

Text availability

Article attribute

Article type

Additional filters

Article Language

Species

Sex

Age

Other

Search Results

92 results

Results by year

Filters applied: . Clear all
Page 1
Photogrammetry Versus Intraoral Scanning in Complete-Arch Digital Implant Impression: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Pozzi A, Arcuri L, Carosi P, Laureti A, Londono J, Wang HL. Pozzi A, et al. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2025 Jun;27(3):e70059. doi: 10.1111/cid.70059. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2025. PMID: 40481748 Free PMC article.
PURPOSE: To evaluate and compare the accuracy of currently available digital technologies, specifically IOS and SPG, in capturing complete-arch implant impressions. ...The search targeted studies (excluding case reports) that assessed the in vivo …
PURPOSE: To evaluate and compare the accuracy of currently available digital technologies, specifically IOS and SPG, in captur …
Digital Impressions in Edentulous Patients: A Systematic Review for Clinical Evidence.
Casucci A, Mazzitelli C, Tsiplakis V, D'Arienzo LF, Breschi L, Ferrari M. Casucci A, et al. Int J Prosthodont. 2023 Sep 12;36(4):486-497. doi: 10.11607/ijp.7483. Int J Prosthodont. 2023. PMID: 37699190
PURPOSE: To evaluate the accuracy, working time, and patient satisfaction of digital impressions (DI) vs conventional impressions (CI) taken for removable prostheses on edentulous arches. ...The search was performed up to June 2022. Only in v …
PURPOSE: To evaluate the accuracy, working time, and patient satisfaction of digital impressions (DI) vs conventional …
Accuracy of complete- and partial-arch impressions of actual intraoral scanning systems in vitro.
Ender A, Zimmermann M, Mehl A. Ender A, et al. Int J Comput Dent. 2019;22(1):11-19. Int J Comput Dent. 2019. PMID: 30848250 Free article.
The best values for trueness of partial-arch impressions were found for the posterior segment, with 9.7 [1.2] m for the conventional impression method (CO), and 21.9 [1.5] m (PS) for the digital impression method. ...Further in vivo stu …
The best values for trueness of partial-arch impressions were found for the posterior segment, with 9.7 [1.2] m for the conventional …
Improved accuracy of digital implant impressions with newly designed scan bodies: an in vivo evaluation in beagle dogs.
Huang R, Liu Y, Huang B, Zhou F, Chen Z, Li Z. Huang R, et al. BMC Oral Health. 2021 Dec 7;21(1):623. doi: 10.1186/s12903-021-01986-2. BMC Oral Health. 2021. PMID: 34876122 Free PMC article.
BACKGROUND: The accuracy of digital impressions for fully edentulous cases is currently insufficient for routinely clinical application. To overcome the challenge, a modified scan body was introduced, which demonstrated satisfactory accuracy in vitro. The aim …
BACKGROUND: The accuracy of digital impressions for fully edentulous cases is currently insufficient for routinely clinical …
Accuracy of Analog and Digital Full-Arch Mandibular Impressions: In Vitro and In Vivo Evaluation.
Cerghizan D, Jánosi KM, Farcas A, Bojan MM, Muntean MH, Nechiti AAM, Mureșan IÉ, Pop SI, Marada G. Cerghizan D, et al. Diagnostics (Basel). 2025 Aug 19;15(16):2077. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics15162077. Diagnostics (Basel). 2025. PMID: 40870928 Free PMC article.
Our study aims to evaluate the in vitro and in vivo accuracy of digital impressions compared to conventional methods in full-arch scans using an intraoral reference tool. ...However, in vivo, both workflows delivered statistically …
Our study aims to evaluate the in vitro and in vivo accuracy of digital impressions compared to conventio …
In Vivo and In Vitro Comparison of Internal and Marginal Fit of Digital and Conventional Impressions for Full-Coverage Fixed Restorations: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Hasanzade M, Shirani M, Afrashtehfar KI, Naseri P, Alikhasi M. Hasanzade M, et al. J Evid Based Dent Pract. 2019 Sep;19(3):236-254. doi: 10.1016/j.jebdp.2019.04.003. Epub 2019 Apr 25. J Evid Based Dent Pract. 2019. PMID: 31732100
STUDY SELECTION: The analysis included in vivo and in vitro studies reporting the marginal or internal gap of full-coverage restorations that provide both the conventional and digital impression. ...The impression technique did not significantly …
STUDY SELECTION: The analysis included in vivo and in vitro studies reporting the marginal or internal gap of full-coverage re …
A novel in vivo method to evaluate trueness of digital impressions.
Albdour EA, Shaheen E, Vranckx M, Mangano FG, Politis C, Jacobs R. Albdour EA, et al. BMC Oral Health. 2018 Jul 3;18(1):117. doi: 10.1186/s12903-018-0580-9. BMC Oral Health. 2018. PMID: 29970056 Free PMC article.
BACKGROUND: Intraoral scanners are devices for capturing digital impressions in dentistry. Until now, several in vitro studies have assessed the trueness of digital impressions, but in vivo studies are missing. Therefore, the purpose of t …
BACKGROUND: Intraoral scanners are devices for capturing digital impressions in dentistry. Until now, several in vitro studies …
Full-Arch Digital Implant Impression Trueness: An in Vivo Study.
Rutkūnas V, Kuleš D, Revilla-León M, Akulauskas M, Auškalnis L, Gendvilienė I. Rutkūnas V, et al. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2025 May;36(5):640-649. doi: 10.1111/clr.14411. Epub 2025 Jan 31. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2025. PMID: 39891340
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the trueness of maxillary and mandibular full-arch implant digital impressions with and without additional reference objects. ...CONCLUSIONS: IOS for the full-arch cases had statistically and clinically significant distance and …
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the trueness of maxillary and mandibular full-arch implant digital impressions with and without …
Digital scans versus conventional impressions in fixed prosthodontics: An overview of systematic reviews.
Kaitatzidou A, Chalazoniti A, Faggion CM, Bakopoulou A, Barbosa-Liz DM, Giannakopoulos NN. Kaitatzidou A, et al. J Prosthet Dent. 2025 Dec;134(6):2156-2164. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2024.11.002. Epub 2024 Dec 3. J Prosthet Dent. 2025. PMID: 39627077 Review.
Among these, 12 performed meta-analyses, and 18 comprised both in vitro and in vivo primary studies. Generally, digital scanning and conventional impression techniques for crowns and fixed partial dentures, for implant-supported fixed restorations, and …
Among these, 12 performed meta-analyses, and 18 comprised both in vitro and in vivo primary studies. Generally, digital …
An Evaluation of the Accuracy of Digital Models-An In Vitro Study.
Jánosi KM, Cerghizan D, Bai EE, Mureșan IÉ, Kovács A, Szász A, Hulpe A, Markovics ER, Mártha KI, Pop SI. Jánosi KM, et al. Dent J (Basel). 2024 Sep 29;12(10):313. doi: 10.3390/dj12100313. Dent J (Basel). 2024. PMID: 39452441 Free PMC article.
Our in vitro study aims to assess the accuracy of digital models obtained from one laboratory and two less commonly used intraoral scanners by conducting 3D measurements on the digital models obtained. ...The scanning protocol and calibration must be optimized for t …
Our in vitro study aims to assess the accuracy of digital models obtained from one laboratory and two less commonly used intraoral sc …
92 results