Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation

Search Page

Filters

My Custom Filters

Edit custom filters

Results by year

Table representation of search results timeline featuring number of search results per year.

Year Number of Results
2000 1
2005 1
2007 1
2012 1
2013 1
2014 2
2016 3
2017 2
2018 5
2019 3
2020 5
2021 2
2022 8
2023 8
2024 8
2025 7
2026 2

Publication date

Text availability

Article attribute

Article type

Additional filters

Article Language

Species

Sex

Age

Other

Search Results

52 results

Results by year

Filters applied: . Clear all
Page 1
Digital vs Conventional Implant Impressions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Papaspyridakos P, Vazouras K, Chen YW, Kotina E, Natto Z, Kang K, Chochlidakis K. Papaspyridakos P, et al. J Prosthodont. 2020 Oct;29(8):660-678. doi: 10.1111/jopr.13211. Epub 2020 Jul 16. J Prosthodont. 2020. PMID: 32613641
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Electronic and manual searches were conducted to identify in vitro and clinical studies, reporting on the 3D accuracy between digital and conventional implant impressions. Secondary outcomes were the effect of implant angulation, type o …
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Electronic and manual searches were conducted to identify in vitro and clinical studies, reporting on the 3D accuracy …
Digital vs Conventional Full-Arch Implant Impressions: A Retrospective Analysis of 36 Edentulous Jaws.
Papaspyridakos P, De Souza A, Finkelman M, Sicilia E, Gotsis S, Chen YW, Vazouras K, Chochlidakis K. Papaspyridakos P, et al. J Prosthodont. 2023 Apr;32(4):325-330. doi: 10.1111/jopr.13536. Epub 2022 May 31. J Prosthodont. 2023. PMID: 35524647
PURPOSE: There is a paucity of comparative clinical studies assessing the accuracy of full-arch digital scans versus conventional implant impressions. The aim of this retrospective study was to compare the three-dimensional (3D) deviations between full-arch …
PURPOSE: There is a paucity of comparative clinical studies assessing the accuracy of full-arch digital scans versus conventional …
Digital Versus Conventional Impressions in Fixed Prosthodontics: A Review.
Ahlholm P, Sipilä K, Vallittu P, Jakonen M, Kotiranta U. Ahlholm P, et al. J Prosthodont. 2018 Jan;27(1):35-41. doi: 10.1111/jopr.12527. Epub 2016 Aug 2. J Prosthodont. 2018. PMID: 27483210
For fabrication of implant-supported crowns and FDPs, digital impression accuracy is clinically acceptable. In full-arch impressions, conventional impression methods resulted in better accuracy compared to digital impressions. ...B …
For fabrication of implant-supported crowns and FDPs, digital impression accuracy is clinically acceptable. In full-arch im …
Conventional Dental Impressions vs. Impressions Reinforced with Rigid Mouthguards.
Novac AC, Tudor A, Pop DM, Neagu CS, Crăciunescu EL, Romînu M, Negruțiu ML, Duma VF, Sinescu C. Novac AC, et al. Polymers (Basel). 2024 Apr 4;16(7):994. doi: 10.3390/polym16070994. Polymers (Basel). 2024. PMID: 38611252 Free PMC article.
In this respect, the present work proposes a new type of dental impression, which is reinforced with rigid mouthguards. The aim of the study is to test the performances of such new impressions by comparing them to conventional ones-from this critical p …
In this respect, the present work proposes a new type of dental impression, which is reinforced with rigid mouthguards. The ai …
Digital vs. conventional full-arch implant impressions: a comparative study.
Amin S, Weber HP, Finkelman M, El Rafie K, Kudara Y, Papaspyridakos P. Amin S, et al. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2017 Nov;28(11):1360-1367. doi: 10.1111/clr.12994. Epub 2016 Dec 31. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2017. PMID: 28039903
Master cast and conventional impression test casts were digitized with a high-resolution reference scanner (Activity 880 scanner; Smart Optics, Bochum, Germany) to obtain digital files. ...The Games-Howell test showed statistically significant 3D devia …
Master cast and conventional impression test casts were digitized with a high-resolution reference scanner (Activity 88 …
Conventional Vs Digital Impressions: Acceptability, Treatment Comfort and Stress Among Young Orthodontic Patients.
Mangano A, Beretta M, Luongo G, Mangano C, Mangano F. Mangano A, et al. Open Dent J. 2018 Jan 31;12:118-124. doi: 10.2174/1874210601812010118. eCollection 2018. Open Dent J. 2018. PMID: 29492177 Free PMC article.
RESULTS: Data showed no difference in terms of anxiety and stress; however, patients preferred the use of digital impressions systems instead of conventional impression techniques. Alginate impressions resulted as fast as digital impre …
RESULTS: Data showed no difference in terms of anxiety and stress; however, patients preferred the use of digital impressions …
Digital vs. conventional implant impressions: efficiency outcomes.
Lee SJ, Gallucci GO. Lee SJ, et al. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2013 Jan;24(1):111-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2012.02430.x. Epub 2012 Feb 22. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2013. PMID: 22353208
Sixty percent of the participants preferred the digital impression, 7% the conventional impression technique and 33% preferred either technique. CONCLUSIONS: Digital impressions resulted in a more efficient technique …
Sixty percent of the participants preferred the digital impression, 7% the conventional impression technique …
Comparative analyses of accuracy between digital and conventional impressions for complete-arch implant-supported fixed dental prostheses-A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Alfaraj A, Alqudaihi F, Khurshid Z, Qadiri O, Lin WS. Alfaraj A, et al. J Prosthodont. 2026 Mar;35(3):252-274. doi: 10.1111/jopr.14094. Epub 2025 Jul 14. J Prosthodont. 2026. PMID: 40660725 Review.
PURPOSE: To compare the three-dimensional (3D) accuracy of digital (intraoral scanning and photogrammetry) and conventional implant impressions for complete-arch implant-supported fixed dental prostheses. METHODS: A systematic search was conducted in e …
PURPOSE: To compare the three-dimensional (3D) accuracy of digital (intraoral scanning and photogrammetry) and conventional im …
Conventional and Digital Impressions for Fabrication of Complete Implant-Supported Bars: A Comparative In Vitro Study.
Vieira SNV, Lourenço MF, Pereira RC, França EC, Vilaça ÊL, Silveira RR, Silva GC. Vieira SNV, et al. Materials (Basel). 2023 Jun 4;16(11):4176. doi: 10.3390/ma16114176. Materials (Basel). 2023. PMID: 37297310 Free PMC article.
Therefore, it is important to compare conventional and digital impressions for producing implant-supported prostheses. This study aimed to compare the quality of digital intraoral and conventional impressions by measuring the vertical mis …
Therefore, it is important to compare conventional and digital impressions for producing implant-supported prostheses. …
Conventional and digital impressions for complete-arch implant-supported fixed prostheses: time, implant quantity effect and patient satisfaction.
Carneiro Pereira AL, Medeiros VR, Campos MFTP, de Medeiros AKB, Yilmaz B, Carreiro ADFP. Carneiro Pereira AL, et al. J Adv Prosthodont. 2022 Aug;14(4):212-222. doi: 10.4047/jap.2022.14.4.212. Epub 2022 Aug 29. J Adv Prosthodont. 2022. PMID: 36105876 Free PMC article.
PURPOSE: To evaluate and compare the effect of impression type (conventional vs digital) and the number of implants on the time from the impressions to the generation of working casts of mandibular implant-supported fixed complete-arch framework …
PURPOSE: To evaluate and compare the effect of impression type (conventional vs digital) and the number of impla …
52 results