Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation

Search Page

Filters

My NCBI Filters

Results by year

Table representation of search results timeline featuring number of search results per year.

Year Number of Results
1989 1
1992 1
2000 3
2001 7
2002 9
2003 10
2004 9
2005 4
2006 8
2007 2
2008 2
2009 13
2010 7
2011 11
2012 6
2013 7
2014 4
2015 3
2016 2
2017 2
2024 0

Text availability

Article attribute

Article type

Publication date

Search Results

106 results

Results by year

Filters applied: . Clear all
Page 1
Screening for breast cancer with mammography.
Gøtzsche PC, Jørgensen KJ. Gøtzsche PC, et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Jun 4;2013(6):CD001877. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001877.pub5. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013. PMID: 23737396 Free PMC article. Review.
BACKGROUND: A variety of estimates of the benefits and harms of mammographic screening for breast cancer have been published and national policies vary. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effect of screening for breast cancer with mammography on mortality and morbidity. ...T …
BACKGROUND: A variety of estimates of the benefits and harms of mammographic screening for breast cancer have been published and nati …
On the efficacy of screening for breast cancer.
Freedman DA, Petitti DB, Robins JM. Freedman DA, et al. Int J Epidemiol. 2004 Feb;33(1):43-55. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyg275. Int J Epidemiol. 2004. PMID: 15075144 Review.
BACKGROUND: 'Mammography' (screening for breast cancer by X-ray examination) came to be widely-although not universally-accepted in the 1980s when a number of clinical trials demonstrated a substantial reduction in risk. ...METHODS: Qualitative review. RESULTS: The basis f …
BACKGROUND: 'Mammography' (screening for breast cancer by X-ray examination) came to be widely-although not universally-accepted in t …
Breast Cancer Screening in Denmark.
Jørgensen KJ, Gøtzsche PC, Kalager M, Zahl PH. Jørgensen KJ, et al. Ann Intern Med. 2017 Oct 3;167(7):524. doi: 10.7326/L17-0270. Ann Intern Med. 2017. PMID: 28973200 No abstract available.
Is mammography screening for breast cancer really not justifiable?
Miller AB. Miller AB. Recent Results Cancer Res. 2003;163:115-28; discussion 264-6. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-55647-0_11. Recent Results Cancer Res. 2003. PMID: 12903848 Review.
The consensus that breast screening is effective for women aged 50-59 years was shattered when Gotzsche and Olsen suggested that there are no reliable data to support screening by mammography. ...After reviewing the published evidence, I conclude that the additional …
The consensus that breast screening is effective for women aged 50-59 years was shattered when Gotzsche and Olsen suggested th …
Screening for breast cancer with mammography.
Gøtzsche PC, Nielsen M. Gøtzsche PC, et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Jan 19;(1):CD001877. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001877.pub4. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Jun 04;(6):CD001877. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001877.pub5. PMID: 21249649 Updated. Review.
BACKGROUND: A variety of estimates of the benefits and harms of mammographic screening for breast cancer have been published and national policies vary. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effect of screening for breast cancer with mammography on mortality and morbidity. ...T …
BACKGROUND: A variety of estimates of the benefits and harms of mammographic screening for breast cancer have been published and nati …
The breast screening programme and misinforming the public.
Gøtzsche PC, Jørgensen KJ. Gøtzsche PC, et al. J R Soc Med. 2011 Sep;104(9):361-9. doi: 10.1258/jrsm.2011.110078. J R Soc Med. 2011. PMID: 21881087 Free PMC article. Review.
We therefore analysed whether the recent debate and new pivotal data about breast screening has had any impact on the contents of the new 2010 leaflet and on the 2010 Annual Review. ...Concerns about over-diagnosis have not been addressed either and official documents stil …
We therefore analysed whether the recent debate and new pivotal data about breast screening has had any impact on the contents of the …
Breast Cancer Screening: Benefit or Harm?
Jørgensen KJ, Gøtzsche PC. Jørgensen KJ, et al. JAMA. 2016 Apr 5;315(13):1402. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.19126. JAMA. 2016. PMID: 27046370 No abstract available.
Screening for breast cancer with mammography.
Olsen O, Gøtzsche PC. Olsen O, et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2001;(4):CD001877. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001877. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2001. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006 Oct 18;(4):CD001877. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001877.pub2. PMID: 11687128 Updated. Review.
BACKGROUND: Mammographic screening for breast cancer is controversial, as reflected in greatly varying national policies. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effect of screening for breast cancer with mammography on mortality and morbidity. ...Flaws are due to differential ex …
BACKGROUND: Mammographic screening for breast cancer is controversial, as reflected in greatly varying national policies. OBJECTIVES: …
106 results