Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation

Search Page

Filters

My Custom Filters

Edit custom filters

Results by year

Table representation of search results timeline featuring number of search results per year.

Year Number of Results
1834 1
1842 1
1848 1
1849 1
1855 1
1856 2
1859 2
1860 4
1861 1
1863 2
1865 1
1868 1
1869 3
1871 2
1872 1
1873 2
1874 3
1875 4
1876 1
1877 1
1878 1
1881 6
1882 2
1883 2
1884 1
1885 1
1886 1
1887 2
1888 14
1889 15
1890 4
1891 3
1892 2
1893 2
1894 1
1895 2
1896 2
1897 4
1898 3
1899 1
1901 2
1902 2
1903 3
1904 5
1905 4
1906 3
1907 3
1908 1
1909 1
1910 2
1911 2
1912 3
1913 6
1914 5
1915 3
1916 5
1917 1
1918 2
1919 7
1920 7
1921 2
1922 1
1923 2
1924 1
1925 8
1926 5
1927 3
1928 2
1929 3
1930 7
1931 5
1932 4
1933 1
1934 3
1935 3
1936 2
1937 4
1938 2
1939 4
1940 2
1941 1
1942 1
1943 2
1944 3
1945 14
1946 49
1947 57
1948 77
1949 65
1950 86
1951 121
1952 98
1953 98
1954 79
1955 88
1956 71
1957 67
1958 60
1959 69
1960 65
1961 62
1962 67
1963 77
1964 83
1965 256
1966 219
1967 229
1968 256
1969 249
1970 266
1971 249
1972 246
1973 223
1974 251
1975 408
1976 393
1977 441
1978 448
1979 450
1980 377
1981 397
1982 422
1983 462
1984 527
1985 483
1986 481
1987 462
1988 494
1989 654
1990 675
1991 648
1992 584
1993 618
1994 645
1995 616
1996 656
1997 714
1998 736
1999 698
2000 893
2001 827
2002 952
2003 919
2004 1002
2005 1111
2006 1146
2007 1252
2008 1314
2009 1362
2010 1427
2011 1653
2012 1731
2013 1866
2014 1874
2015 1948
2016 2036
2017 2040
2018 2048
2019 2202
2020 2462
2021 2772
2022 2764
2023 2686
2024 2679
2025 2819
2026 1406

Publication date

Text availability

Article attribute

Article type

Additional filters

Article Language

Species

Sex

Age

Other

Search Results

58,914 results

Results by year

Filters applied: . Clear all
Page 1
Dental Impression Materials and Techniques.
Punj A, Bompolaki D, Garaicoa J. Punj A, et al. Dent Clin North Am. 2017 Oct;61(4):779-796. doi: 10.1016/j.cden.2017.06.004. Dent Clin North Am. 2017. PMID: 28886768 Review.
Dental impression making is the process of creating a negative form of the teeth and oral tissues, into which gypsum or other die materials can be processed to create working analogues. ...Although dentists should stay abreast of new technologies, some of the conventional …
Dental impression making is the process of creating a negative form of the teeth and oral tissues, into which gypsum or other die mat …
Comparison of conventional and digital impression approaches for edentulous maxilla: clinical study.
Kahya Karaca S, Akca K. Kahya Karaca S, et al. BMC Oral Health. 2024 Nov 14;24(1):1378. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-05151-3. BMC Oral Health. 2024. PMID: 39543593 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
Currently, there is a trend towards fast, comfortable, reliable, and low-cost methods. In TSCD impressions, simplified impression and digital impression methods involving the use of an intraoral scanner (IOS) are becoming preferable. ...CONCLUSION: In maxilla …
Currently, there is a trend towards fast, comfortable, reliable, and low-cost methods. In TSCD impressions, simplified impression
Functional impression of complete edentulous arches in a digital flow: A scoping review.
Nguyen TV, Srinivasan M, Naveau A. Nguyen TV, et al. J Dent. 2025 Oct;161:105981. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2025.105981. Epub 2025 Jul 16. J Dent. 2025. PMID: 40681137 Free article.
Other studies omitted the functional impression step, designing prostheses based solely on digital study impressions. Digital impression techniques showed promising mucostatic accuracy but consistently failed to capture mobile tissues adequately, limiting the …
Other studies omitted the functional impression step, designing prostheses based solely on digital study impressions. Digital …
Intraoral Digital Impression Technique: A Review.
Ting-Shu S, Jian S. Ting-Shu S, et al. J Prosthodont. 2015 Jun;24(4):313-21. doi: 10.1111/jopr.12218. Epub 2014 Sep 14. J Prosthodont. 2015. PMID: 25220390 Review.
A few published articles have indicated that dental prostheses fabricated from intraoral digital impressions have exhibited remarkable advantages over those from conventional impressions in several respects. The present review discusses intraoral digital impressi
A few published articles have indicated that dental prostheses fabricated from intraoral digital impressions have exhibited remarkabl …
Impression techniques in Removable partial denture: epidemiological study.
Benyahia H, El Benaissi A, Bahij L, Merzouk N, Regragui A. Benyahia H, et al. Tunis Med. 2023 Jan 6;101(1):41-46. Tunis Med. 2023. PMID: 37682259 Free PMC article. English.
RESULTS: Following the results of the statistical study: (57.6%) used the alginate as a secondary impression material, (66%) used individual trays, 17% used models from primary impressions for direct prosthesis fabrication, (17%) used the cast impression tech …
RESULTS: Following the results of the statistical study: (57.6%) used the alginate as a secondary impression material, (66%) used ind …
Digital Versus Conventional Impressions in Fixed Prosthodontics: A Review.
Ahlholm P, Sipilä K, Vallittu P, Jakonen M, Kotiranta U. Ahlholm P, et al. J Prosthodont. 2018 Jan;27(1):35-41. doi: 10.1111/jopr.12527. Epub 2016 Aug 2. J Prosthodont. 2018. PMID: 27483210
For fabrication of implant-supported crowns and FDPs, digital impression accuracy is clinically acceptable. In full-arch impressions, conventional impression methods resulted in better accuracy compared to digital impressions. ...Based on this study, t …
For fabrication of implant-supported crowns and FDPs, digital impression accuracy is clinically acceptable. In full-arch impressio
The organizational principles of impression formation.
Bellucci G. Bellucci G. Cognition. 2023 Oct;239:105550. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2023.105550. Epub 2023 Jul 26. Cognition. 2023. PMID: 37506516 Free article.
The model specifically captured two main patterns of impression formation: (1) a negative valence effect that makes negative impressions loom longer than positive ones; (2) an interaction effect between the temporal and valence content that endorses more negative …
The model specifically captured two main patterns of impression formation: (1) a negative valence effect that makes negative impre
The Potential of Digital Impression in Orthodontics.
Saccomanno S, Saran S, Vanella V, Mastrapasqua RF, Raffaelli L, Levrini L. Saccomanno S, et al. Dent J (Basel). 2022 Aug 8;10(8):147. doi: 10.3390/dj10080147. Dent J (Basel). 2022. PMID: 36005245 Free PMC article.
Traditional dental impressions can be made of different materials, such as alginate, while digital impression is captured by an intra-oral scanner. Digital impression, despite the evident advantages, has not yet replaced the conventional impression. .. …
Traditional dental impressions can be made of different materials, such as alginate, while digital impression is captured by a …
Digital Impressions Versus Conventional Impressions in Prosthodontics: A Systematic Review.
Ahmed S, Hawsah A, Rustom R, Alamri A, Althomairy S, Alenezi M, Shaker S, Alrawsaa F, Althumairy A, Alteraigi A. Ahmed S, et al. Cureus. 2024 Jan 2;16(1):e51537. doi: 10.7759/cureus.51537. eCollection 2024 Jan. Cureus. 2024. PMID: 38304652 Free PMC article. Review.
The accuracy of definitive impressions has a significant impact on the quality of the final prosthesis. Elastic impression materials are commonly used in the traditional approach to replicate anatomical structures while indirectly fabricating prostheses. ...The stud …
The accuracy of definitive impressions has a significant impact on the quality of the final prosthesis. Elastic impression mat …
Does Splinting the Direct Copings Increase the Impression Accuracy of Two-Unit Nonparallel Implant Restorations? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Ma Y, Al-Radhi RYZ, Jiang L, Yu H. Ma Y, et al. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2022 Jul-Aug;37(4):653-659. doi: 10.11607/jomi.9577. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2022. PMID: 35904821
Impressions using splinted impression copings exhibited significantly smaller marginal gaps than those using nonsplinted impression copings (P = .02; mean difference [MD] = -13.34; 95% CI = -24.31 to -2.36). Moreover, with respect to the framework strain, no
Impressions using splinted impression copings exhibited significantly smaller marginal gaps than those using nonsplinted im
58,914 results
You have reached the last available page of results. Please see the User Guide for more information.