Skip to main page content
Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation

Search Page

My NCBI Filters
Results by year

Table representation of search results timeline featuring number of search results per year.

Year Number of Results
1989 1
1993 1
2017 1
2021 0
Text availability
Article attribute
Article type
Publication date

Search Results

3 results
Results by year

Citations

1 article found by citation matching

Search results

Filters applied: . Clear all
Page 1
Your search for rating intervals: an expirement in peer review retrieved no results
Rating intervals: an experiment in peer review.
Green JG, Calhoun F, Nierzwicki L, Brackett J, Meier P. Green JG, et al. FASEB J. 1989 Jun;3(8):1987-92. doi: 10.1096/fasebj.3.8.2721858. FASEB J. 1989. PMID: 2721858
The National Institute of Health (NIH) peer review process for research grant applications is one of the largest and most respected systems of its kind in the world. Recently, however, the distribution of raw priority scores voted by NIH study sections has been skew …
The National Institute of Health (NIH) peer review process for research grant applications is one of the largest and most resp …
A systematic review, and meta-analyses, of the impact of health-related claims on dietary choices.
Kaur A, Scarborough P, Rayner M. Kaur A, et al. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2017 Jul 11;14(1):93. doi: 10.1186/s12966-017-0548-1. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2017. PMID: 28697787 Free PMC article. Review.
METHODS: In September 2016, we searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsychINFO, CAB abstracts, Business Source Complete, and Web of Science/Science Citation Index & Social Science Citation Index for articles in English published in peer-review journals. Studies were include …
METHODS: In September 2016, we searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsychINFO, CAB abstracts, Business Source Complete, and Web of Science/Science Cita …
How reliable is peer review of scientific abstracts? Looking back at the 1991 Annual Meeting of the Society of General Internal Medicine.
Rubin HR, Redelmeier DA, Wu AW, Steinberg EP. Rubin HR, et al. J Gen Intern Med. 1993 May;8(5):255-8. doi: 10.1007/BF02600092. J Gen Intern Med. 1993. PMID: 8505684
Each abstract was reviewed by five to seven reviewers. Each reviewer's ratings of the three dimensions were added to compute that reviewer's summary score for a given abstract. ...Future meeting organizers may wish to rank abstracts using global ratings
Each abstract was reviewed by five to seven reviewers. Each reviewer's ratings of the three dimensions were added to compute t …