Exploratory Disposal and Reuse Feasibility Analysis of Winter Maintenance Wash Water

PLoS One. 2016 Feb 23;11(2):e0149500. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0149500. eCollection 2016.

Abstract

The Ohio Department of Transportation has more than 60 facilities without sewer access generating approximately 19 million gallons of winter maintenance wash water. Off-site disposal is costly, creating the need for sustainable management strategies. The objective of this study was to conduct an exploratory feasibility analysis to assess wash water disposal and potential reuse as brine. Based on a comprehensive literature review and relevant environmental chemistry, a sampling protocol consisting of 31 water quality constituents was utilized for monthly sampling at three geographically distinct Ohio Department of Transportation garages during the winter of 2012. Results were compared to local disposal and reuse guidance limits. Three constituents, including a maximum copper concentration of 858 ppb, exceeded disposal limits, and many constituents also failed to meet reuse limits. Some concentrations were orders of magnitude higher than reuse limits and suggest pre-treatment would be necessary if wash water were reused as brine. These water quality results, in conjunction with copper chemical equilibrium modeling, show pH and dissolved carbon both significantly impact the total dissolved copper concentration and should be measured to assess reuse potential. The sampling protocol and specific obstacles highlighted in this paper aid in the future development of sustainable wash water management strategies.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Carbon / chemistry
  • Copper / analysis
  • Hydrogen-Ion Concentration
  • Motor Vehicles*
  • Ohio
  • Recycling
  • Seasons
  • Waste Disposal, Fluid / methods*
  • Wastewater / chemistry*
  • Water Quality

Substances

  • Waste Water
  • Carbon
  • Copper

Grants and funding

This work was supported by the Federal Highway Administration, SJN 134629 (CMM WHS). The funder had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.