Comparative study of pulsed dye laser and pneumatic lithotripters for transurethral ureterolithotripsy

Int J Urol. 2000 May;7(5):172-5. doi: 10.1046/j.1442-2042.2000.00163.x.

Abstract

Background: Clinical effectiveness and safety of the Swiss Lithoclast (Lithoclast) and the Candela MDL-2000 (MDL) in the treatment of lower ureteral stone were examined retrospectively.

Methods: Eighty-six stones from 66 patients and 26 stones from 20 patients were treated by Lithoclast and MDL, respectively.

Results: The stone-free rate on 3-month follow-up was 97% and 95% for the Lithoclast and MDL, respectively (no significant difference). The operation time was significantly shorter for the Lithoclast than for the MDL (90.2+/-50.2 vs 120.4+/-55.1 min; P<0.05). Postoperative analgesics were required significantly less frequently in Lithoclast (10/66 vs 11/20; P<0.01). Postoperative hospital stay was significantly shorter for Lithoclast (8.7+/-5.1 vs 12.1+/-4.2 days; P<0.01).

Conclusions: Swiss Lithoclast is an effective and less invasive modality for endoscopic treatment of lower ureteral stones.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Female
  • Follow-Up Studies
  • Humans
  • Lithotripsy, Laser / methods*
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Treatment Outcome
  • Ureteral Calculi / therapy*
  • Ureteroscopy / methods*