Background: The goal of this study was to evaluate the correlation between increments of penile tumescence and penile rigidity measured by the erectometer and the RigiScan, respectively.
Methods: Nocturnal penile tumescence (NPT) was measured in 25 volunteers (mean age, 49.5 years). The erectometer and the RigiScan were used simultaneously for a total of 47 nights. We studied the correlation between maximum penile circumferential changes determined by the erectometer and penile rigidity patterns measured by the RigiScan.
Results: Maximum circumferential changes during NPT measured by the erectometer were well correlated to those determined by the RigiScan (correlation coefficient, 0.719). In addition, penile circumferential changes measured by the erectometer corresponded well to the penile rigidity pattern determined by the RigiScan (P=0.0001). Specifically, maximum penile circumferential changes of more than 30 mm and less than 10 mm had 70% positive predictive value and 100% negative predictive value for predicting the normal rigidity pattern, respectively.
Conclusions: Penile circumferential changes measured by the erectometer were well correlated to penile rigidity measured by the RigiScan, particularly when the increments were larger than 30 mm or less than 10 mm. These results suggested that the erectometer was a useful tool to estimate the penile rigidity patterns of the RigiScan.