Radiologically guided percutaneous fine-needle aspiration biopsy of the liver: retrospective study of 119 cases evaluating diagnostic effectiveness and clinical complications

Diagn Cytopathol. 2002 May;26(5):283-9. doi: 10.1002/dc.10097.

Abstract

We reviewed 119 percutaneous, radiologically guided fine-needle aspirations (FNA) from 114 patients with liver masses to evaluate diagnostic effectiveness and complications of this procedure. Satisfactory material was obtained in 118 cases (99%), of which 78 were diagnosed as positive (66%), three suspicious (2%), five atypical (4%), and 32 (27%) as negative for malignancy. Compared to surgical biopsy (48 cases) and clinical data, the sensitivity and specificity of FNA for malignancy was 95.1% and 100%, respectively, yielding a positive predictive value of 100% and a negative predictive value of 88.8%. Four cytology cases (3.4%) were false-negatives (FN); all were interpretive errors. Four FN surgical biopsies (8.3%) were sampling errors. Minor complications occurred in three cases (2.5%). We conclude that FNA is safe and effective for determining the malignant potential of liver masses and should be the procedure of choice. Our experience suggests that having a pathologist present in the radiology suite provides optimal patient care.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study

MeSH terms

  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Biopsy, Needle / adverse effects*
  • Child
  • Child, Preschool
  • Female
  • Fluoroscopy
  • Humans
  • Infant
  • Liver Neoplasms / diagnostic imaging*
  • Liver Neoplasms / pathology*
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Nausea / etiology
  • Pain / etiology
  • Predictive Value of Tests
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Sensitivity and Specificity
  • Skin / pathology
  • Tachycardia / etiology
  • Tomography, X-Ray Computed
  • Ultrasonography