Predictors of outcome in a fatigued population in primary care following a randomized controlled trial

Psychol Med. 2003 Feb;33(2):283-7. doi: 10.1017/s0033291702007006.

Abstract

Background: The objective of this study was to examine factors that predicted outcome in a chronically fatigued group of patients who were randomized to cognitive behaviour therapy or counselling in primary care.

Method: Illness perceptions, attributions, fatigue, disability and demographic variables were recorded at assessment and levels of fatigue and disability were measured at 6 months post randomization. Logistic regression was used to examine associations.

Results: Factors that predicted a poor outcome (four or more on the fatigue questionnaire) were: poor social adjustment at assessment; the patients self-report that they had never seen the GP for an emotional reason; a physical illness attribution; and, a long perceived future illness duration.

Conclusions: Patients who are more psychologically minded are more likely to improve with psychological treatments in primary care. General practitioners need to assess this before referring to an appropriate therapist.

Publication types

  • Clinical Trial
  • Randomized Controlled Trial
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Attitude to Health
  • Catchment Area, Health
  • Cognitive Behavioral Therapy*
  • Counseling*
  • Demography
  • Disability Evaluation
  • England / epidemiology
  • Fatigue Syndrome, Chronic / diagnosis
  • Fatigue Syndrome, Chronic / epidemiology*
  • Fatigue Syndrome, Chronic / therapy*
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Logistic Models
  • Male
  • Mental Health Services / standards
  • Mental Health Services / statistics & numerical data*
  • Middle Aged
  • Outcome Assessment, Health Care
  • Primary Health Care / methods*
  • Surveys and Questionnaires
  • Time Factors