Background: The need for immunosuppression in autoimmune hepatitis is established. Previous studies have investigated short-term outcomes in patients who respond to treatment. This study assesses long-term prognosis of patients who fail to respond to standard immunosuppression.
Methods: 163 charts were reviewed, composed of 108 non-transplant patients and 55 patients who required liver transplantation (LT). Clinical endpoints were based on aminotransaminases: early treatment response (ER) was a 50% improvement at 6 months of therapy, Complete remission (CR) was an improvement to <2X normal, Relapse was worsening to >3X normal, Incomplete response (IR) was some response but no CR in 3 years, and No response (NR) was no improvement after 3 years.
Results: 85% of non-LT and 25% of LT patients achieved ER, 91% of non-LT and 26% of LT patients achieved CR. 41% of non-LT patients relapsed on maintenance treatment, and 41% of non-LT patients relapsed when withdrawn from treatment. 9% of non-LT and 58% of LT patients had IR. 16% in LT group showed NR, while all non-LT patients showed some response. All paired comparisons were statistically different (P<0.05). Multiple regression analysis revealed that lack of ER predicts need for LT (P=0.0005). 87% of patients who achieved ER did not require LT, whereas 16% of patients who failed ER showed NR and all required LT. Odds ratio of a patient who failed ER proceeding to LT, compared to a patient who achieved ER, was 16.8 (7.5 to 37.7, 95% CI).
Conclusion: Patients who fail to show a 50% improvement in transaminases at 6 months of standard immunosuppression should be considered for alternate treatment modalities or be referred earlier for LT.