Cervical cytology: a randomized comparison of four sampling methods

Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1992 Jun;166(6 Pt 1):1772-7; discussion 1777-9. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(92)91568-u.

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this study was to compare smear quality and endocervical cell recovery of four cervical smear sampling devices.

Study design: Two thousand fifteen patients undergoing routine cervical smears at the University of Tennessee Obstetrics and Gynecology clinics were randomly assigned to a cotton swab-spatula, Cytobrush-spatula, Cervex-Brush, or Bayne Pap Brush. The cytopathology laboratory, blind to method, used specific criteria to grade smears as being optimal, adequate, marginal, or inadequate. Statistical analysis was by the chi 2 and analysis of variance tests.

Results: No statistical differences occurred among the groups for nonpregnant patients. For pregnant patients smear quality was improved with both Cytobrush-spatula and Bayne Pap Brush versus cotton swab-spatula (p = 0.0301 and 0.0004, respectively); cotton swab-spatula had fewer endocervical cells than the Cytobrush-spatula (p = 0.0001), Cervex-Brush (p = 0.0288), and Bayne Pap Brush (p = 0.0081).

Conclusions: The cotton swab-spatula and Cytobrush-spatula appear to be the most effective screening methods for nonpregnant and pregnant patients, respectively.

Publication types

  • Clinical Trial
  • Comparative Study
  • Randomized Controlled Trial

MeSH terms

  • Biopsy
  • Cervix Uteri / cytology*
  • Cervix Uteri / pathology
  • Colposcopy
  • Equipment Design
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Pregnancy
  • Random Allocation
  • Uterine Cervical Dysplasia / diagnosis
  • Vaginal Smears / instrumentation
  • Vaginal Smears / methods*