Airtraq vs standard laryngoscopy by student paramedics and experienced prehospital laryngoscopists managing a model of difficult intubation

Anaesthesia. 2008 Jan;63(1):26-31. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2007.05263.x.

Abstract

Two consecutive, randomised, cross-over trials compared intubation success rates in third-year paramedic students and experienced prehospital practitioners using the Airtraq or a Macintosh laryngoscope with flexible stylet in a manikin model of a Cormack and Lehane grade III/IV laryngoscopic view. First-time intubation rates for the Macintosh and Airtraq for students were 0/23 (0%) vs 10/23 (44%) (44% difference, 95% CI 26-63%, p < 0.001) and for experienced laryngoscopists were 14/56 (25%) vs 47/56 (84%) (59% difference, 95% CI 42-72%, p < 0.0001), respectively. First-time oesophageal intubation rates for students were 15/23 (65%) vs 3/23 (13%) (-52% difference, 95% CI -25 to -72%, p < 0.001) and for experienced practitioners 9/56 (16%) vs 0/56 (0%) (-16% difference, 95% CI -9 to -28%, p = 0.0014). Student paramedics and experienced prehospital laryngoscopists managing a manikin model of a grade III/IV view had increased first-time intubation rates and had lower rates of oesophageal intubation with the Airtraq compared with a standard laryngoscope.

Publication types

  • Randomized Controlled Trial
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Clinical Competence
  • Cross-Over Studies
  • Emergency Medical Services / methods
  • Emergency Medical Technicians / standards*
  • Equipment Design
  • Esophagus
  • Foreign Bodies / etiology
  • Humans
  • Intubation, Intratracheal / adverse effects
  • Intubation, Intratracheal / instrumentation*
  • Intubation, Intratracheal / methods
  • Laryngoscopes*
  • Laryngoscopy / methods
  • Manikins
  • Middle Aged