Obesity classification in military personnel: a comparison of body fat, waist circumference, and body mass index measurements

Mil Med. 2008 Jan;173(1):67-73. doi: 10.7205/milmed.173.1.67.

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate obesity classifications from body fat percentage (BF%), body mass index (BMI), and waist circumference (WC).

Methods: A total of 451 overweight/obese active duty military personnel completed all three assessments.

Results: Most were obese (men, 81%; women, 98%) using National Institutes of Health (NIH) BF% standards (men, >25%; women, >30%). Using the higher World Health Organization (WHO) BF >35% standard, 86% of women were obese. BMI (55.5% and 51.4%) and WC (21.4% and 31.9%) obesity rates were substantially lower for men and women, respectively (p < 0.05). BMI/WC were accurate discriminators for BF% obesity (theta for all comparisons >0.75, p < 0.001). Optimal cutoff points were lower than NIH/WHO standards; WC = 100 cm and BMI = 29 maximized sensitivity and specificity for men, and WC = 79 cm and BMI = 25.5 (NIH) or WC = 83 cm and BMI = 26 (WHO) maximized sensitivity and specificity for women.

Conclusions: Both WC and BMI measures had high rates of false negatives compared to BF%. However, at a population level, WC/BMI are useful obesity measures, demonstrating fair-to-high discriminatory power.

Publication types

  • Clinical Trial
  • Comparative Study
  • Randomized Controlled Trial
  • Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.

MeSH terms

  • Adipose Tissue*
  • Adiposity*
  • Adult
  • Anthropometry
  • Body Mass Index*
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Military Medicine
  • Military Personnel*
  • Obesity / classification*
  • Obesity / epidemiology
  • Obesity / physiopathology
  • Reference Values
  • Risk Factors
  • United States / epidemiology
  • Waist-Hip Ratio*