Objective: To understand the mechanism of effect of conditioned immune response in curing bronchial asthma.
Methods: An experimental asthma modal was produced on healthy BALB/C mice (female, 4 - 6 weeks old) by sensitization and stimulation with ovalbumin (OV A). Totally 105 mice were divided into 7 groups randomly with 15 in each and treated differently: in group CIR(1), noise was used as conditioned stimulus (CS) and budesonide and salbutamol as unconditioned stimulus (UCS) respectively, a conditioned immune response model of mice with asthma was established by the combination of CS and UCS 7 times (7 days), then the mice were given CS only, and the combination were given once a week for 20 weeks. In group CIR(2) saccharin (SAC) was taken as CS, and the other treatments were the same as the group CIR(1). In the group of conventional therapy, the mice were given inhalation of nebulized budesonide and salbutamol only for 20 weeks. In the group of lower dose conventional therapy, the mice were given nebulized inhalation of budesonide and salbutamol for the first 7 days, then once a week for 20 weeks. In the noise group the mice were given noise only everyday for 20 weeks. In SAC group the mice were treated with SAC only everyday for 20 weeks. In the blank control group the mice were treated with placebo for 20 weeks. The mice in all the groups were stimulated with OVA once a day. The mice in the healthy control group were given PBS inhalation for 20 weeks. After 20 weeks therapy, the bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) was taken for eosinophils (EOS) counting. The spleens were taken to obtain CD4(+)T lymphocytes and the expression of neuronal acetylcholine receptor alpha 7 (nAChRalpha7), IL-4, IFN-gamma and IL-17 were detected by flow cytometry.
Results: (1) The percent of EOS of groups CIR(1), CIR(2), conventional therapy and healthy control was much lower than that of blank control (P < 0.01), and there was no significant difference among groups CIR(1), CIR(2) and conventional therapy (P > 0.05). (2) The expression of nAChRalpha7, IL-4 and IL-17 of groups CIR(1), CIR(2), conventional therapy and healthy control was much lower than that in blank control group, IFN-gamma was much higher (P < 0.01), and no significant difference was found among groups CIR(1), CIR(2) and conventional therapy (P > 0.05). There was a positive correlation between nAChRalpha7 and IL-4 (r = 0.76, P < 0.01), nAChRalpha7 and IL-17 (r = 0.46, P < 0.01). There was a negative correlation between nAChRalpha7 and IFN-gamma (r = 0.69, P < 0.01). (3) In the groups treated with lower dose of conventional therapy, noise, SAC and blank control, the epithelial tissue of airway were much thicker, the lumens were much narrower, and inflammatory cells and collagen fibers were much more than in the healthy control group, and after therapy, the inflammation in groups CIR(1), CIR(2) and conventional therapy was significantly improved.
Conclusion: The conditioned immune response models established by both noise and SAC as CS and budesonide and salbutamol as UCS can downregulate nAChRalpha7 on CD4(+)T lymphocytes, regulate the function of CD4(+)T lymphocytes, and achieve the same therapeutic efficacy in treatment of asthma.