Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the relationship between coronary run-off and myocardial viability in jeopardized regions.
Method: We studied 50 patients (40 male, mean age: 55.63 +/- 10.54 years) with coronary artery stenosis >70% and ejection fraction <40% referred for viability study via dobutamine stress echocardiography. The relationship between coronary run-off and viability was evaluated. Good run-off demonstrates good or moderate and no run-off means poor or no run-off.
Results: In the apical region, 33% of the segments with good antegrade run-off were viable and 67% nonviable. Also, 72% of the segments with no run-off were nonviable and 28% viable. In the midportion region, 70% of the segments with good antegrade run-off were viable and 30% nonviable; 50% of the segments with no run-off were nonviable and 50% viable. In the basal region, 85% of the segments with good antegrade run-off were viable and 15% nonviable; 19% of the segments with no run-off were nonviable and 81% viable. The proportion of the nonviable segments increased significantly from the basal to apical regions either with good (p < 0.001) or no run-off (p = 0.004). From 239 viable segments, 58.6% had antegrade, 15.4% retrograde, and 25.5% no run-off. Of 181 nonviable segments, 44% had antegrade, 34% retrograde, and 34.8% no run-off.
Conclusion: There was more susceptibility to nonviability in the apical regions despite good run-off, while the basal segments showed more viability in spite of having no run-off. The findings may be helpful for selecting patients with coronary artery disease and left ventricular systolic dysfunction that benefit from revascularization.