Bilateral movement training and stroke motor recovery progress: a structured review and meta-analysis

Hum Mov Sci. 2010 Oct;29(5):853-70. doi: 10.1016/j.humov.2009.09.004. Epub 2009 Nov 18.

Abstract

The purpose was to conduct a structured review and meta-analysis to determine the cumulative effect of bilateral arm training on motor capabilities post stroke. Forty-eight stroke studies were selected from three databases with 25 comparisons qualifying for inclusion in our meta-analysis. We identified and coded four types of bilateral arm interventions with 366 stroke patients. A random effects model using the standardized mean difference technique determined a large and significant effect size (0.734; SE=0.125), high fail-safe N (532), and medium variability in the studies (I(2)=63%). Moderator variable analysis on the type of bilateral training revealed two large and significant effects: (a) BATRAC (0.842; SE=0.155) and (b) coupled bilateral and EMG-triggered neuromuscular stimulation (1.142; SE=0.176). These novel findings provide strong evidence supporting bilateral arm training with the caveat that two coupled protocols, rhythmic alternating movements and active stimulation, are most effective.

Publication types

  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Databases as Topic / standards
  • Electromyography
  • Functional Laterality / physiology
  • Humans
  • Meta-Analysis as Topic
  • Middle Aged
  • Motor Activity / physiology*
  • Movement / physiology*
  • Patient Selection
  • Research / standards
  • Stroke / physiopathology*
  • Stroke Rehabilitation*