A combined TCD and MRA screening for significant siphon portion of internal carotid artery (S-ICA) stenosis

J Neuroimaging. 2012 Apr;22(2):172-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1552-6569.2010.00567.x. Epub 2011 Jan 11.

Abstract

Background: We investigated whether combined transcranial Doppler (TCD) and magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) can diagnose significant stenosis (s-stenosis) of the siphon portion of the internal carotid artery (S-ICA) on digital subtraction angiography (DSA).

Methods: TCD criteria cut-off peak systolic blood-flow velocity of 75 cm/s or mean blood-flow velocity of 50 cm/s, with both values more than 30% higher than in the contralateral S-ICA. MRA criterion was defined as a ≥50% signal reduction of the column width. Combined TCD and MRA criteria were fulfillment of both TCD and MRA criteria.

Results: Among 295 vessels, seven (2%) had s-stenosis on DSA. Using TCD criteria, 16 vessels (5%) were identified to have s-stenosis, of which six (38%) had s-stenosis on DSA (sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value [PPV], and negative predictive value [NPV] were .86, .97, .38, and .99). Using MRA criteria, 17 (6%) vessels were s-stenosis, of which seven (41%) had s-stenosis on DSA. Sensitivity, specificity, and NPV were 1.00, .97, and 1.00; however, PPV was low (.41). Combined TCD and MRA criteria identified six (2%) vessels as having s-stenosis, all were s-stenosis on DSA (PPV was 1.00).

Conclusion: Combined TCD and MRA examinations have similar diagnostic power to DSA.

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Angiography, Digital Subtraction
  • Blood Flow Velocity
  • Carotid Artery, Internal / diagnostic imaging*
  • Carotid Stenosis / diagnosis*
  • Carotid Stenosis / diagnostic imaging
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Magnetic Resonance Angiography
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Predictive Value of Tests
  • Ultrasonography, Doppler, Transcranial