Knee separation distance and lower extremity kinematics during a drop land: implications for clinical screening

J Athl Train. 2011 Sep-Oct;46(5):471-5. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-46.5.471.

Abstract

Context: Excessive knee valgus during dynamic tasks is thought to contribute to lower extremity overuse and traumatic injuries. Clinically, assessments of frontal-plane knee motion typically include measures of the distance between the knees during landing. However, it is not clear how this clinical assessment relates to knee-abduction angle or how it is influenced by the position of the lower extremities in the transverse and frontal planes.

Objective: To determine whether normalized knee separation distance (NKSD) is a predictor of knee-abduction angles and to assess the influence of lower extremity transverse-plane and frontal-plane angles on NKSD during a drop land.

Design: Cross-sectional study.

Setting: Motion analysis laboratory.

Patients or other participants: Twenty-five healthy female athletes.

Intervention(s): The frontal-plane distance between the 2-dimensional coordinates of markers over the greater trochanters (intertrochanteric distance), lateral femoral epicondyles (knee separation distance), and lateral malleoli (stance width) bilaterally was calculated during a drop land. The knee separation distance was normalized by intertrochanteric distance (NKSD). Concurrently, 3-dimensional lower extremity transverse-plane and frontal-plane kinematics were obtained.

Main outcome measure(s): We assessed NKSD, stance width, and bilateral average knee and hip transverse plane and frontal-plane angles and ankle frontal-plane angles. Linear regression was used to determine the association between NKSD and bilateral average knee frontal-plane angles. Stepwise multiple regression was used to identify the best predictors of NKSD during the drop land.

Results: After we controlled for stance width, NKSD explained 52% of the variance in the knee frontal-plane angle. When we took lower extremity kinematics into account, after controlling for stance width, the average hip frontal-plane angle was the best predictor of NKSD, explaining 97% of the variance.

Conclusions: Although NKSD is a predictor of knee-abduction angle, frontal-plane hip angle and stance width are strongly related to NKSD. Caution must be taken when interpreting NKSD as knee abduction.

Publication types

  • Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural

MeSH terms

  • Adolescent
  • Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries
  • Athletes
  • Biomechanical Phenomena
  • Child
  • Cross-Sectional Studies
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Knee / physiology*
  • Knee Joint / physiology*
  • Locomotion
  • Lower Extremity / physiology
  • Young Adult