Association between adiponectin concentrations and cardiovascular disease in diabetic patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PLoS One. 2013 Nov 4;8(11):e78485. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0078485. eCollection 2013.

Abstract

Background: This systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies evaluates the association between adiponectin concentrations and risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) in individuals with diabetes mellitus (DM).

Methods: PubMed and Embase were searched for prospective studies on the association of adiponectin concentrations and risk of CVD up to June 2013. Random-effect model was selected to pool the relative risk (RR) and 95% CI.

Results: Five prospective cohort studies and one nested case-control studies met the included criterion. The estimated summary RR and 95% CI of five prospective cohort studies for type 2 diabetes comparing top vs low tertile of adiponectin concentrations was 0.99 (95% CI: 0.67-1.45), with significant heterogeneity between studies (p = 0.037, I (2) = 60.9%). This heterogeneity was explained by one study conducted in Korean.

Conclusions: This study represents the first meta-analysis between adiponectin levels and CVD in diabetic patients and indicated no association was found. This result should be verified further by large sample size, long duration of follow-up, and well-designed prospective clinical trials.

Publication types

  • Meta-Analysis
  • Review
  • Systematic Review

MeSH terms

  • Adiponectin / blood*
  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Asian People
  • Cardiovascular Diseases / blood*
  • Cardiovascular Diseases / complications
  • Cardiovascular Diseases / ethnology
  • Cardiovascular Diseases / physiopathology
  • Databases, Bibliographic
  • Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 / blood*
  • Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 / complications
  • Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 / ethnology
  • Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 / physiopathology
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Prospective Studies
  • Risk Factors

Substances

  • Adiponectin

Grants and funding

The authors have no support or funding to report.