Clinical characteristics, management, and control of permanent vs. nonpermanent atrial fibrillation: insights from the RealiseAF survey

PLoS One. 2014 Jan 31;9(1):e86443. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0086443. eCollection 2014.

Abstract

Background: Atrial fibrillation can be categorized into nonpermanent and permanent atrial fibrillation. There is less information on permanent than on nonpermanent atrial fibrillation patients. This analysis aimed to describe the characteristics and current management, including the proportion of patients with successful atrial fibrillation control, of these atrial fibrillation subsets in a large, geographically diverse contemporary sample.

Methods and results: Data from RealiseAF, an international, observational, cross-sectional survey of 10,491 patients with atrial fibrillation, were used to characterize permanent atrial fibrillation (N = 4869) and nonpermanent atrial fibrillation (N = 5622) patients. Permanent atrial fibrillation patients were older, had a longer time since atrial fibrillation diagnosis, a higher symptom burden, and were more likely to be physically inactive. They also had a higher mean (SD) CHADS2 score (2.2 [1.3] vs. 1.7 [1.3], p<0.001), and a higher frequency of CHADS2 score ≥2 (67.3% vs. 53.0%, p<0.001) and comorbidities, most notably heart failure. Physicians indicated using a rate-control strategy in 84.2% of permanent atrial fibrillation patients (vs. 27.5% in nonpermanent atrial fibrillation). Only 50.2% (N = 2262/4508) of permanent atrial fibrillation patients were controlled. These patients had a longer time since atrial fibrillation diagnosis, a lower symptom burden, less obesity and physical inactivity, less severe heart failure, and fewer hospitalizations for acute heart failure than uncontrolled permanent atrial fibrillation patients, but with more arrhythmic events. The most frequent causes of hospitalization in the last 12 months were acute heart failure and stroke.

Conclusion: Permanent atrial fibrillation is a high-risk subset of atrial fibrillation, representing half of all atrial fibrillation patients, yet rate control is only achieved in around half. Since control is associated with lower symptom burden and heart failure, adequate rate control is an important target for improving the management of permanent atrial fibrillation patients.

Publication types

  • Multicenter Study
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Amiodarone / therapeutic use
  • Anti-Arrhythmia Agents / therapeutic use
  • Atrial Fibrillation / classification
  • Atrial Fibrillation / complications
  • Atrial Fibrillation / drug therapy*
  • Cardiovascular Diseases / complications
  • Cardiovascular Diseases / drug therapy*
  • Cross-Sectional Studies
  • Digoxin / therapeutic use
  • Echocardiography
  • Electrocardiography
  • Female
  • Health Surveys / methods
  • Health Surveys / statistics & numerical data*
  • Heart / drug effects
  • Heart / physiopathology
  • Hospitalization / statistics & numerical data*
  • Humans
  • Logistic Models
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Multivariate Analysis
  • Risk Factors
  • Sotalol / therapeutic use

Substances

  • Anti-Arrhythmia Agents
  • Digoxin
  • Sotalol
  • Amiodarone

Grants and funding

The RealiseAF survey was funded by sanofi (http://en.sanofi.com). The funders had a role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, and preparation of the manuscript: the sanofi author assisted with the preparation of the manuscript and approved the manuscript for publication; sanofi had a role in data analysis via funding of the statistician at Lincoln; and PPSI was supported by sanofi.