Availability of empty zona pellucida for generating embryonic chimeras

PLoS One. 2015 Apr 28;10(4):e0123178. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0123178. eCollection 2014.

Abstract

In the present study we used an empty zona pellucida derived from hatched blastocysts as an alternative source for embryo aggregation and compared results with the conventional microwell method. Denuded 4-cell stage porcine embryos were aggregated by introduction into an empty zona or placement within a concave microwell. The present study showed that although the rate of aggregate formation was similar, the blastocyst rates and allocation of more cells to the inner cell mass (ICM) in the resultant aggregates were increased significantly more in the empty zona than in the microwell. Notably, using an empty zona showed no limitations with regards to the increased number of embryos aggregated or embryonic stages for aggregation, while partial or no aggregation frequently occurred in the microwell. The discrepancy may be due to the difference of microenvironments where the embryos were placed namely, the presence/absence of zona pellucida. We hypothesize the success of the empty zona in generating aggregates is due to the physical aggregation of individual embryos allowing closer contact between the blastomeres and/or embryos compared with a concave microwell. These results indicate that aggregation conditions could influence overall production efficiency and developmental potential of aggregates, suggesting physical restraint via empty zona that provide three-dimensional pressures is an important factor for successful embryo aggregation.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Animals
  • Blastocyst / cytology*
  • Chimera
  • Embryo Culture Techniques / methods*
  • Embryonic Development
  • Female
  • Swine / anatomy & histology
  • Swine / embryology*
  • Zona Pellucida / physiology*

Grants and funding

This work was supported by Biogreen 21 program (PJ01130012015) of Rural development administration and the Ministry of Food and Drug Safety (KFDA2013-18075), Republic of Korea. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.