[Risk and benefit of sulfonylureas--their role in view of new treatment options for type 2 diabetes]

Med Monatsschr Pharm. 2016 Feb;39(2):65-72; quiz 73-4.
[Article in German]

Abstract

Currently, the therapy with oral antidiabetic drugs undergoes major changes. The use of sulfonylureas is in marked decline. The major argument in favor of newer oral antidiabetic drugs is the lower risk of hypoglycemia. At the present time however, it is unclear whether DDP4 inhibitors or SGLT2 inhibitors lead to better outcomes with respect to cardiovascular events and overall mortality. Most evidence on the therapeutic use of sulfonylureas has been gained with glibenclamide and to some degree sulfonylureas and glibenclamide have become synonymous. Since sulfonylureas vary considerably in their affinity for the K(ATP) channel subtypes and in their pharmacokinetic properties, the epidemiological evidence that outcomes tend to be less favorable with glibenclamide than with glimepiride or gliclazide has gained some attention. Beyond debate is the efficacy of metformin to diminish cardiovascular events in type 2 diabetes, probably due to effects beyond the lowering of blood glucose.

Publication types

  • English Abstract
  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 / drug therapy*
  • Drug Interactions
  • Drug Therapy, Combination
  • Humans
  • Hypoglycemic Agents / adverse effects*
  • Hypoglycemic Agents / therapeutic use*
  • Risk Assessment
  • Sulfonylurea Compounds / adverse effects*
  • Sulfonylurea Compounds / therapeutic use*

Substances

  • Hypoglycemic Agents
  • Sulfonylurea Compounds