Reduction of misregistration on cerebral four-dimensional computed tomography angiography images using advanced patient motion correction reconstruction

Jpn J Radiol. 2016 Sep;34(9):605-10. doi: 10.1007/s11604-016-0563-1. Epub 2016 Jul 5.

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate whether advanced patient motion correction (APMC) can reduce the misregistration of pixels between the different X-ray tube positions in four-dimensional CT angiography (4D-CTA).

Materials and methods: Eight patients with intracranial aneurysms were included in this retrospective study. We compared the CTA images with APMC reconstruction and half-scan reconstruction with regard to the following 3 items: (1) bone misalignment area; (2) image noise; and (3) aneurysm volume change.

Results: The bone misalignment area and image noise were significantly reduced in the APMC images, as compared to that in the half-scan reconstruction images (bone misalignment area: 33.0 ± 18.1 cm(3) vs 152.0 ± 72.2 cm(3), respectively; p < 0.001) (image noise at pons: 9.70 ± 2.58 vs 15.16 ± 5.02, respectively, p < 0.001). The aneurysm volume and volume variance were significantly smaller in the APMC reconstruction than those in the half-scan reconstruction (volume: 1107.2 ± 1813.8 mm(3) vs 1135.1 ± 1853.8 mm(3); p < 0.05; coefficient of variation: 0.0291 ± 0.014 vs 0.0463 ± 0.026, p < 0.05, respectively).

Conclusion: Our results show that APMC reduces the reconstruction related misregistration between the cardiac phases compared to half-scan reconstruction.

Keywords: 4D-CTA; Brain aneurysm; Different orbital angle related location gap; Motion correction.

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Brain / diagnostic imaging
  • Cerebral Angiography / methods*
  • Computed Tomography Angiography / methods*
  • Female
  • Four-Dimensional Computed Tomography / methods*
  • Humans
  • Image Processing, Computer-Assisted / methods*
  • Intracranial Aneurysm / diagnostic imaging*
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted / methods*
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Sensitivity and Specificity