Introduction: Laparoscopic adrenalectomy has become the preferred approach for removal of the adrenal gland for the management of benign or malignant functioning or nonfunctioning adrenal masses. We aimed to present our initial experience with this procedure. In addition, we compare the clinical outcomes of laparoscopic (LA) vs. the open adrenalectomies (OA) performed at our institutions. Also we report a case of successful laparoscopic treatment of splenic artery aneurism involving laparoscopic splenectomy.
Patients and methods: A retrospective analysis of the data of all patients who underwent adrenalectomy at three institutions, over the last 12-year period, since the laparoscopic adrenal surgery was introduced in our country. All patients were assessed regarding the demographic data, hormonal status, operative time, estimated blood loss, complications, size of the tumor, number of patients requiring blood transfusion, hospital stay and conversion to open surgery for LA.
Results: Thirty five consecutive patients, aged from 33 to 67 (average age 54 years) underwent unilateral LA adrenalectomy during the study period including 14 right and 21 left sided. The laparoscopic procedure was successfully completed in all except 4 cases, which were converted to open surgery to control bleeding from the avulsed adrenal veins. LA proved superior to OA, resulting in less estimated blood loss, shorter operating time, shorter time to resumption of oral intake, shorter postoperative hospital stay and less analgesic requirements. During the follow-up of 3 to 36 months no tumor recurrence and/or metastasis developed.
Conclusions: Our results concur with other retrospective reviews comparing laparoscopic and open adrenalectomy, demonstrating unequivocal advantages in terms of reduced length of hospital stay, blood loss, return of bowel function, functional recovery and post-operative morbidity.