Assessment of the efficacy and safety of fluticasone propionate and salmeterol delivered as a combination dry powder via a capsule-based inhaler and a multi-dose inhaler in patients with asthma

Pulm Pharmacol Ther. 2016 Dec:41:19-24. doi: 10.1016/j.pupt.2016.09.002. Epub 2016 Sep 4.

Abstract

Background: In developing countries, there is a need for access to affordable inhaled respiratory medicines. This study tested the clinical non-inferiority of fluticasone propionate/salmeterol combination (FSC) 50/250 μg Rotacaps®/Rotahaler® compared with FSC 50/250 μg Diskus®.

Methods: A multi-centre, randomised, double-blind, double-dummy study evaluated 12 weeks, twice daily treatment of FSC 50/250 μg administered using Rotacaps/Rotahaler or Diskus inhaler in a crossover design in patients with asthma (pre-bronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) 40%-85% of predicted, FEV1 reversibility ≥12%, prior stable dose with inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) or ICS/long acting beta-agonist). The primary efficacy endpoint, change from baseline in trough morning FEV1 at Day 85, was analysed using a model for repeated measures analysis. The pre-defined criterion for non-inferiority was the lower limit of the CI (0.025, one-sided significance level) for the treatment difference (Rotacaps/Rotahaler-Diskus) in least squares (LS) mean change from baseline, being greater than -125 mL. Secondary endpoints included serial FEV1 measurements, morning peak expiratory flow (PEF), rescue medication use, day- and night-time asthma symptoms, Asthma Control Test (ACT) scores, and serial cortisol measured over 12 h (area under the curve (AUC0-12)).

Results: Treatment with FSC 50/250 μg via Rotacaps/Rotahaler or Diskus resulted in a similar LS mean increase from baseline in trough FEV1 at Day 85 (231 mL and 203 mL respectively). The difference in the model-adjusted LS mean change was 28 mL (95% CI -24 mL, 80 mL), fulfilling the criterion for non-inferiority. Data for all secondary endpoints were similar for the two treatments, supporting the primary endpoint findings. Both treatments were well tolerated and demonstrated similar safety profiles.

Conclusion: This study demonstrated the clinical non-inferiority of FSC 50/250 μg when administered using Rotacaps/Rotahaler compared with administration using Diskus in patients with asthma, and suggests there is no difference in the risk:benefit profile between the two FSC inhalers.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01978119.

Keywords: Asthma; Fluticasone propionate; Multi-dose inhaler; Non-inferiority; Salmeterol; Unit-dose inhaler.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Multicenter Study
  • Randomized Controlled Trial
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Administration, Inhalation
  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Anti-Asthmatic Agents / administration & dosage*
  • Anti-Asthmatic Agents / adverse effects
  • Asthma / drug therapy*
  • Asthma / physiopathology
  • Bronchodilator Agents / administration & dosage
  • Bronchodilator Agents / adverse effects
  • Child
  • Cross-Over Studies
  • Double-Blind Method
  • Female
  • Fluticasone-Salmeterol Drug Combination / administration & dosage*
  • Fluticasone-Salmeterol Drug Combination / adverse effects
  • Forced Expiratory Volume
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Nebulizers and Vaporizers
  • Peak Expiratory Flow Rate
  • Treatment Outcome
  • Young Adult

Substances

  • Anti-Asthmatic Agents
  • Bronchodilator Agents
  • Fluticasone-Salmeterol Drug Combination

Associated data

  • ClinicalTrials.gov/NCT01978119