Genome wide analysis of the evolution of Senecavirus A from swine clinical material and assembly yard environmental samples

PLoS One. 2017 May 5;12(5):e0176964. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0176964. eCollection 2017.

Abstract

Senecavirus A (SVA), previously known as Seneca Valley virus, was first isolated in the United States in 2002. SVA was associated with porcine idiopathic vesicular disease in Canada and the USA in 2007 and 2012, respectively. Recent increase in SVA outbreaks resulting in neonatal mortality of piglets and/or vesicular lesions in sows in Brazil, the USA and Canada point to the necessity to study the pathogenicity and molecular epidemiology of the virus. Here, we report the analysis of the complete coding sequences of SVA from 2 clinical cases and 9 assembly yard environmental samples collected in 2015 in Canada, along with 22 previously released complete genomes in the GenBank. With this combined data set, the evolution of the SVA over a 12-month period in 2015/2016 was evaluated. These SVA isolates were characterized by a rapid accumulation of genetic variations driven mainly by a high nucleotide substitution rate and purifying selection. The SVA sequences clustered in clearly defined geographical areas with reported cases of SVA infection. No transmission links were identified between assembly yards, suggesting that point source introductions may have occurred. In addition, 25 fixed non-synonymous mutations were identified across all analyzed strains when compared to the prototype SVA strain (SVV-001). This study highlights the importance of monitoring SVA mutations for their role in increased virulence and impact on SVA diagnostics.

MeSH terms

  • Animals
  • Canada / epidemiology
  • Disease Outbreaks
  • Genome, Viral*
  • Phylogeny
  • Picornaviridae / classification
  • Picornaviridae / genetics*
  • Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction
  • Swine / virology*
  • Swine Vesicular Disease / epidemiology
  • Swine Vesicular Disease / virology
  • United States / epidemiology

Grants and funding

This work was supported by the Canadian Food Inspection Agency. The funder had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.