Impact of adherence to antidepressants on healthcare outcomes and costs among patients with type 2 diabetes and comorbid major depressive disorder

Curr Med Res Opin. 2017 Oct;33(10):1879-1889. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2017.1347092. Epub 2017 Aug 2.

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the association between adherence to antidepressants and an effect on clinical outcomes and healthcare costs in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) and comorbid type 2 diabetes (T2D).

Methods: This retrospective study used MarketScan claims data from January 2012 to March 2014. Study entry was the first claim for an antidepressant and a diagnosis code for MDD and T2D in the prior 6 months. Adherence and persistence with antidepressant therapy in the first 180 days were defined as medication possession ratio (MPR) ≥ 80% and length of therapy (LOT), with no treatment gap of >15 days, respectively. T2D control (HbA1c <7%), oral diabetes medication adherence, and healthcare costs were measured in the 12 month post-index period. The impact of antidepressant adherence and persistence on outcomes was assessed using multivariable analyses.

Results: Among the 1361 patients included, the mean age was 59 years and 55% were women. About one-third of the patients were adherent (35.9%, mean MPR = 40%), persistent (32.0%, average LOT = 100 days), and adherent/persistent (31.2%) on antidepressants. Being adherent, persistent, or adherent/persistent to antidepressants was associated with a two-fold improvement in adherence to oral diabetes medications. Of those with HbA1c data (n = 121), adherence or adherence/persistence to antidepressants was associated with patients being five times more likely to have T2D control (odds ratio [OR]: 4.95; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.39, 17.59, p = .0134). Comparison between antidepressant-persistent and non-persistent patients was not significant. Mean difference in adjusted all-cause annual costs showed lower costs among antidepressant-adherent and adherent/persistent patients (adherent: -$350, 95% CI: -$462, -$247; adherent/persistent: -$1165; 95% CI: -$1280, -$1060).

Conclusions: Patients with better antidepressant adherence and adherence/persistence demonstrated better HbA1c control, with lower all-cause total and medical costs. Adherence, persistence, or adherence/persistence to antidepressants was associated with improved adherence to oral diabetes medications.

Keywords: Antidepressive agents; depressive disorder, major; diabetes mellitus, type 2; healthcare costs; hemoglobin A1c protein, human; medication adherence; medication persistence.

MeSH terms

  • Antidepressive Agents / therapeutic use*
  • Depressive Disorder, Major* / complications
  • Depressive Disorder, Major* / drug therapy
  • Depressive Disorder, Major* / economics
  • Depressive Disorder, Major* / epidemiology
  • Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2* / complications
  • Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2* / economics
  • Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2* / epidemiology
  • Female
  • Health Care Costs / statistics & numerical data
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Medication Adherence / statistics & numerical data*
  • Middle Aged
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Treatment Outcome

Substances

  • Antidepressive Agents