Hemodynamic forces in the left and right ventricles of the human heart using 4D flow magnetic resonance imaging: Phantom validation, reproducibility, sensitivity to respiratory gating and free analysis software

PLoS One. 2018 Apr 5;13(4):e0195597. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0195597. eCollection 2018.

Abstract

Purpose: To investigate the accuracy, reproducibility and sensitivity to respiratory gating, field strength and ventricle segmentation of hemodynamic force quantification in the left and right ventricles of the heart (LV and RV) using 4D-flow magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and to provide free hemodynamic force analysis software.

Materials and methods: A pulsatile flow phantom was imaged using 4D flow MRI and laser-based particle image velocimetry (PIV). Cardiac 4D flow MRI was performed in healthy volunteers at 1.5T (n = 23). Reproducibility was investigated using MR scanners from two different vendors on the same day (n = 8). Subsets of volunteers were also imaged without respiratory gating (n = 17), at 3T on the same day (n = 6), and 1-12 days later on the same scanner (n = 9, median 6 days). Agreement was measured using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC).

Results: Phantom validation showed good accuracy for both scanners (Scanner 1: bias -14±9%, y = 0.82x+0.08, R2 = 0.96, Scanner 2: bias -12±8%, y = 0.99x-0.08, R2 = 1.00). Force reproducibility was strong in the LV (0.09±0.07 vs 0.09±0.07 N, bias 0.00±0.04 N, ICC = 0.87) and RV (0.09±0.06 vs 0.09±0.05 N, bias 0.00±0.03, ICC = 0.83). Strong to very strong agreement was found for scans with and without respiratory gating (LV/RV: ICC = 0.94/0.95), scans on different days (ICC = 0.92/0.87), and 1.5T and 3T scans (ICC = 0.93/0.94).

Conclusion: Software for quantification of hemodynamic forces in 4D-flow MRI was developed, and results show high accuracy and strong to very strong reproducibility for both the LV and RV, supporting its use for research and clinical investigations. The software including source code is released freely for research.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
  • Validation Study

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Cardiac Imaging Techniques* / instrumentation
  • Cardiac Imaging Techniques* / methods
  • Female
  • Heart Ventricles / diagnostic imaging*
  • Hemodynamics* / physiology
  • Humans
  • Imaging, Three-Dimensional* / instrumentation
  • Imaging, Three-Dimensional* / methods
  • Magnetic Resonance Imaging* / instrumentation
  • Magnetic Resonance Imaging* / methods
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Phantoms, Imaging
  • Pressure
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Respiratory-Gated Imaging Techniques / instrumentation
  • Respiratory-Gated Imaging Techniques / methods
  • Software
  • Time Factors
  • Ventricular Function
  • Young Adult

Grants and funding

This study was funded by the Research Council, Sweden (Vetenskapsrådet, grants 2012-4944 and 2016-01617), the Knowledge Foundation and the National Visualization Programme (Kunskap- och Kompetensstiftelsen, grant 2009-0080), The Region of Scania, Sweden (Region Skåne), The Medical Faculty at Lund University, Sweden (Medicinska Fakulteten vid Lunds Universitet), and The Heart-Lung Foundation, Sweden (Hjärt-Lungfonden). While Dr. Einar Heiberg is the owner of the company Medviso AB, the company did not fund or influence the design, analysis or presentation of data in the present study.