Benefits of biodiverse marine resources to child nutrition in differing developmental contexts in Hispaniola

PLoS One. 2018 May 24;13(5):e0197155. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0197155. eCollection 2018.

Abstract

There is an urgent need for an improved empirical understanding of the relationship among biodiverse marine resources, human health and development outcomes. Coral reefs are often at this intersection for developing nations in the tropics-an ecosystem targeted for biodiversity conservation and one that provides sustenance and livelihoods for many coastal communities. To explore these relationships, we use the comparative development contexts of Haiti and the Dominican Republic on the island of Hispaniola. We combine child nutrition data from the Demographic Health Survey with coastal proximity and coral reef habitat diversity, and condition to empirically test human benefits of marine natural resources in differing development contexts. Our results indicate that coastal children have a reduced likelihood of severe stunting in Haiti but have increased likelihoods of stunting and reduced dietary diversity in the Dominican Republic. These contrasting results are likely due to the differential in developed infrastructure and market access. Our analyses did not demonstrate an association between more diverse and less degraded coral reefs and better childhood nutrition. The results highlight the complexities of modelling interactions between the health of humans and natural systems, and indicate the next steps needed to support integrated development programming.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Animals
  • Anthozoa / physiology
  • Biodiversity
  • Child
  • Child Development / physiology*
  • Child Nutritional Physiological Phenomena*
  • Conservation of Natural Resources*
  • Coral Reefs
  • Dominican Republic
  • Female
  • Fishes / physiology*
  • Food Supply / economics*
  • Haiti
  • Humans
  • Male

Grants and funding

This work was funded by the United States Agency for International Development, Bureau for Economic Growth, Education, and Environment, Office of Forestry and Biodiversity, which contributed to study design and project management, and provided the funding to cover the PLOS ONE publishing fee. ICF provided support in the form of salaries for G.T. and K.J., but did not have any additional role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. Neither Westat nor the US Agency for International Development, Bureau of Food Security provided any support for this work and did not have any additional roles. The specific roles of these authors are articulated in the ‘author contributions’ section. The views and ideas expressed are entirely the authors' own and do not reflect an official position of USAID