Commentary: On the levels of patient selection in registry-based randomized controlled trials

Trials. 2019 Feb 4;20(1):100. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3214-x.

Abstract

Registry-based randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are presumed to include a less-selected patient population and thus to have enhanced generalizability compared to conventional RCTs. However, this view disregards the levels of patient selection in registry-based RCTs: the registry selection level and the trial selection level. At both levels, systematic selection can occur and generalizability can be diminished. Nevertheless, using a registry as a basis for recruitment, randomization, and data collection results in an advantage: the trial selection takes place within the registry framework, where baseline characteristics of non-enrolled patients are automatically documented as well. By comparing the baseline variables of the enrolled and non-enrolled patients, the trial selection can always be investigated, which gives a sound basis for discussing the generalizability to the registry population.

Keywords: External validity; Generalizability; Patient selection; Pragmatic trials; Registry; Registry-based RCT.

Publication types

  • Letter

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Patient Selection*
  • Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
  • Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic / methods*
  • Registries*
  • ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction / diagnosis
  • ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction / surgery
  • Suction
  • Thrombectomy / methods
  • Treatment Outcome