Graft alignment impacts the regenerative response of skeletal muscle after volumetric muscle loss in a rat model

Abstract

A key event in the etiology of volumetric muscle loss (VML) injury is the bulk loss of structural cues provided by the underlying extracellular matrix (ECM). To re-establish the lost cues, there is broad consensus within the literature supporting the utilization of implantable scaffolding. However, while scaffold based regenerative medicine strategies have shown potential, there remains a significant amount of outcome variability observed across the field. We suggest that an overlooked source of outcome variability is differences in scaffolding architecture. The goal of this study was to test the hypothesis that implant alignment has a significant impact on genotypic and phenotypic outcomes following the repair of VML injuries. Using a rat VML model, outcomes across three autograft implant treatment groups (aligned implants, 45° misaligned, and 90° misaligned) and two recovery time points (2 weeks and 12 weeks) were examined (n = 6-8/group). At 2 weeks post-repair there were no significant differences in muscle mass and torque recovery between the treatment groups, however we did observe a significant upregulation of MyoD (2.5 fold increase) and Pax7 (2 fold increase) gene expression as well as the presence of immature myofibers at the implant site for those animals repaired with aligned autografts. By 12 weeks post-repair, functional and structural differences between the treatment groups could be detected. Aligned autografts had significantly greater mass and torque recovery (77 ± 10% of normal) when compared to 45° and 90° misaligned autografts (64 ± 10% and 61 ± 11%, respectively). Examination of tissue structure revealed extensive fibrosis and a significant increase in non-contractile tissue area fraction for only those animals treated using misaligned autografts. When taken together, the results suggest that implant graft orientation has a significant impact on in-vivo outcomes and indicate that the effect of graft alignment on muscle phenotype may be mediated through genotypic changes to myogenesis and fibrosis at the site of injury and repair. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: A key event in the etiology of volumetric muscle loss injury is the bulk loss of architectural cues provided by the underlying extracellular matrix. To re-establish the lost cues, there is broad consensus within the literature supporting the utilization of implantable scaffolding. Yet, although native muscle is a highly organized tissue with network and cellular alignment in the direction of contraction, there is little evidence within the field concerning the importance of re-establishing native architectural alignment. The results of this study suggest that critical interactions exist between implant and native muscle alignment cues during healing, which influence the balance between myogenesis and fibrosis. Specifically, it appears that alignment of implant architectural cues with native muscle cues is necessary to create a pro-myogenic environment and contractile force recovery. The results also suggest that misaligned cues may be pathological, leading to fibrosis and poor contractile force recovery.