A comparison of cancer stage at diagnosis and treatment initiation between enrollees in an urban HIV clinic and SEER

Cancer Causes Control. 2020 May;31(5):511-516. doi: 10.1007/s10552-020-01289-x. Epub 2020 Mar 6.

Abstract

Purpose: A comparison of stage at cancer diagnosis and cancer treatment rates between people with HIV (PWH) and the general US population is needed to identify any disparities by HIV status.

Methods: We compared 236 PWH in clinical care diagnosed with cancer from 1997 to 2014 to a sample from NCI's Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) Program, presumed to be HIV negative. We performed G-computation using random forest methods to estimate stage and treatment percent differences (PD) by HIV. We conducted sensitivity analyses among non-AIDS-defining cancers (NADC), by sex and by CD4 ≤ 200 or > 200 cells/mm3.

Results: PWH were less likely to be diagnosed at localized stage (PD = - 16%; 95% CI - 21, - 11) and more likely to be diagnosed at regional stage (PD = 14%; 95% CI 8, 19) than those in SEER. Cancer treatment rates were 13% lower among PWH as compared to SEER (95% CI - 18, - 8). The difference in percent receiving cancer treatment was more pronounced for those with lower CD4 at cancer diagnosis (PD -15%; 95% CI - 27, - 6). Lower treatment rates were observed among NADC, males, and women with CD4 ≤ 200.

Conclusion: Cancer care for PWH could be improved by diagnosis at earlier stages and increasing rates of cancer treatment.

Keywords: CD4; Cancer; Cancer stage; Cancer treatment; HIV infection.

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Female
  • HIV Infections / epidemiology*
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Neoplasm Staging
  • Neoplasms / epidemiology
  • Neoplasms / pathology*
  • SEER Program
  • Young Adult