Clinical outcomes of endoscopic ultrasound-guided gastroenterostomy for gastric outlet obstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2022 Feb;31(2):159-167. doi: 10.1080/13645706.2020.1792500. Epub 2020 Jul 16.

Abstract

Background and aims: EUS-guided gastroenterostomy (EUS-GE) has been used for gastric outlet obstruction (GOO) with promising clinical outcomes. Therefore, we aimed to determine the clinical outcomes of EUS-GE for GOO.

Material and methods: We used the keyword 'EUS-guided gastroenterostomy' to search in Pubmed, Web of science, Cochrane databases. Clinical outcomes of EUS-GE were evaluated in terms of technical success, clinical success and complications.

Results: Ten studies reported 297 patients managed with EUS-GE. Weighted pooled rates (WPR) for technical success, clinical success and complications of EUS-GE were 91% (95%CI 87%-94%), 88% (95%CI 83%-91%) and 6.8% (95%CI 4.1%-11.0%). The most common complications were abdominal pain, 6.7% (95%CI 2.5%-16.5%) and bleeding, 4.8% (95%CI 1.5%-13.9%). Two studies compared EUS-GE with surgical gastrojejunostomy (SGJ). Pooled risk ratio (RR) for technical success, clinical success and complications were 0.87 (0.78, 0.97), I2 = 0%; 0.92 (0.82, 1.04), I2 = 0%; 0.28 (0.11, 0.68), I2 = 0%. Three studies compared benign GOO with malignant GOO. RR for technical success and clinical success were 1.05 (0.82, 1.34), I2 = 0%; 0.98 (0.72, 1.33), I2 = 0%.

Conclusions: Although EUS-GE and SGJ had similar clinical success rates, EUS-GE had a lower complication rate. EUS-GE is a safe, effective, and minimally invasive choice for patients with GOO.

Keywords: Endoscopic ultrasound-guided gastroenterostomy; gastric outlet obstruction; surgical gastrojejunostomy.

Publication types

  • Meta-Analysis
  • Systematic Review

MeSH terms

  • Endosonography
  • Gastric Outlet Obstruction* / surgery
  • Gastroenterostomy / adverse effects
  • Humans
  • Stents
  • Ultrasonography, Interventional*