Histological Evaluation of Human Pulp Response to Direct Pulp Capping with MTA, CEM Cement, and Biodentine

Razieh Hoseinifar; Ali Eskandarizadeh; Masoud Parirokh; Molook Torabi; Fereshteh Safarian; Elina Rahmanian

doi:10.30476/DENTJODS.2019.81796.0

Histological Evaluation of Human Pulp Response to Direct Pulp Capping with MTA, CEM Cement, and Biodentine

J Dent (Shiraz). 2020 Sep;21(3):177-183. doi: 10.30476/DENTJODS.2019.81796.0.

Authors

Razieh Hoseinifar¹, Ali Eskandarizadeh², Masoud Parirokh³, Molook Torabi⁴, Fereshteh Safarian⁵, Elina Rahmanian⁶

Affiliations

¹ Oral and Dental Diseases Research Center, Dept. of Operative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran.
² Dept. of Operative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran.
³ Dept. of Endodontic, School of Dentistry, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran.
⁴ Dept. of Pathology, Faculty of Dentistry, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran.
⁵ Dept. of Orthodontic, School of Dentistry, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran.
⁶ Dept. of Operative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Zahedan University of Medical Sciences, Zahedan, Iran.

Abstract

Statement of the problem: Direct pulp capping (DPC) is an established method in which the exposed pulp is coated with a suitable material to prevent further damage and to help its repair and healing. Different proposed materials may have different impact on pulp response during this treatment.

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare the response of human dental pulp after DPC with calcium-enriched mixture (CEM), mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) cement, and Biodentine.

Materials and method: In this clinical trial study, class V cavities were prepared on the buccal surfaces of 30 human premolar teeth, until the pulps were mechanically exposed. Then, teeth were randomly pulp capped with MTA, CEM cement and Biodentine, followed by resin modified glass ionomer filling. The fourth group was the control group (n= 10), in which the teeth were extracted without any prior intervention. Six weeks after the intervention, the teeth were extracted and prepared for histological evaluation in terms of the type and degree of pulp inflammation, dentin bridge formation and the presence of necrosis. Data were analyzed using Kruskal-Wallis and Mann Whitney U tests.

Results: In all groups, necrosis was not observed and inflammation was chronic. The Biodentine group exhibited significantly more pulpal inflammation compared with the other groups (p= 0.001). There were no significant differences among CEM cement, MTA and Biodentine in terms of the dentine bridge formation. The thickness of the dentin bridge formed in the Biodentine group was significantly higher than MTA and control group (p= 0.035 and p= 0.011, respectively).

Conclusion: Although the dentin bridge formation and the thickness of dentin bridge formed in the Biodentine group were higher than the other groups, pulp showed greater inflammation compared to CEM cement and MTA. The results of this study suggested that MTA and CEM cement performed better when employed as the direct pulp capping material.

Keywords: Dental pulp; Dental pulp capping; Inflammation.