Perceptual harmony in judgments of group prototypicality and intragroup respect

PLoS One. 2020 Dec 22;15(12):e0243821. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0243821. eCollection 2020.

Abstract

We test common sense psychology of intragroup relations whereby people assume that intragroup respect and ingroup prototypicality are positively related. In Study 1a, participants rated a group member as more prototypical if they learned that group member was highly respected rather than disrespected. In Study 1b, participants rated a group member as more respected by other group members if they learned that group member was prototypical rather than unprototypical. As a commonsense psychology of groups, we reasoned that the perceived relationship between prototypicality and intragroup respect would be stronger for cohesive groups compared to incohesive groups. The effect of intragroup respect on perceptions of prototypicality (Study 2a & 2c) and the effect of prototypicality on perceptions of intragroup respect (Study 2b) were generally stronger for participants considering cohesive groups relative to incohesive groups. However, the interaction effect of prototypicality and group cohesion on intragroup respect did fail to replicate in Study 2d. In Studies 3, 4a, and 4b we manipulated the relationship between prototypicality and intragroup respect and found that when these variables were in perceptual harmony participants perceived groups as more cohesive. The results of eight out of nine studies conducted are consistent with the prediction that people make inferences about intragroup respect, prototypicality, and group cohesion in a manner that maintains perceptual harmony.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Cooperative Behavior*
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Judgment*
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Respect
  • Social Perception*
  • Young Adult

Grants and funding

This research was supported through a Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (SSHRC) grant to the third author. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.