As disparities in healthcare access and outcomes have been increasingly identified across medical specialties, the importance of recognizing and understanding the diversity of our patient populations and the influence of individual characteristics such as age, sex, gender, race, and ethnicity on clinical outcomes has been emphasized. Orthopaedic literature has advanced dramatically in the quality and quantity of research generated over the past 25 years, yet a consistent, sustained focus on studying musculoskeletal health in the context of these unique patient-specific variables has not been maintained. The result of this inattention may be the provision of orthopaedic care that is ill-suited for the individual patient whose biologic characteristics, life experiences, and cultural constructs differ from that of the typical research subject. The recent proliferation of meta-analyses-whose intention is to optimize statistical power-likely compounds the problem because improper, inconsistent, or absent categorization of patients in research articles precludes meaningful subgroup analysis. This article describes the current variability in demographic reporting in the orthopaedic literature, highlights the importance of complete, consistent demographic reporting and subgroup analysis, and reviews specific examples of orthopaedic conditions that illustrate how clinical outcomes may be affected by patient-specific variables such as age, sex, gender, race, and ethnicity.
Copyright © 2021 by the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons.