Ring finger sensory latency difference in the diagnosis and treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome

BMC Neurol. 2021 Nov 5;21(1):432. doi: 10.1186/s12883-021-02462-8.

Abstract

Objective: To explore the sensitivity of median and ulnar nerve sensory latency differences in diagnosing carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) at different severities.

Methods: CTS patients were divided into three groups based on disease severity (mild, moderate, and severe). Distal latency of sensory nerve action potential (SNAP) for the median and ulnar nerves was recorded. The sensitivity of SNAP distal latency to CTS and its correlation with CTS severity were analyzed.

Results: Significant differences were found in the median nerve sensory action potential distal latency (MSDL) and in the median and ulnar sensory latency difference to ring finger (MUD) but not in the ulnar nerve sensory action potential distal latency (USDL) between CTS and control. The sensitivity and specificity were 92.2 and 99.4% with an MSDL cutoff value of 2.40 ms, respectively, and were both 100% with a MUD cutoff value of 0.33 ms. There was no significant difference in USDL among the CTS and control groups. Significant differences were found in MSDL and MUD among the CTS severities and between mild and moderate CTS, but not between mild and severe CTS or between moderate and severe CTS. Correlations with CTS severity were observed for MSDL and MUD but not for USDL.

Conclusion: The ulnar nerve of the CTS patients was not damaged. A smaller MSDL reflected median nerve damage, which can be used for the early diagnosis of CTS. MUD correlated with CTS severity with a higher sensitivity than MSDL, which can provide therapeutic insight without pain to patients.

Keywords: carpal tunnel syndrome; median nerve; nerve conduction studies; sensory distal latency; ulnar nerve.

MeSH terms

  • Carpal Tunnel Syndrome* / diagnosis
  • Carpal Tunnel Syndrome* / therapy
  • Fingers
  • Humans
  • Median Nerve
  • Neural Conduction
  • Ulnar Nerve