Once daily (OD) versus twice-daily (BID) chemoradiation for limited stage small cell lung cancer (LS-SCLC): A meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials

Gustavo A Viani; Andre G Gouveia; Fernando K Matsuura; Alexandre A Jacinto; Fabio Y Moraes

doi:10.1016/j.radonc.2022.01.032

Once daily (OD) versus twice-daily (BID) chemoradiation for limited stage small cell lung cancer (LS-SCLC): A meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials

Radiother Oncol. 2022 Aug:173:41-48. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2022.01.032. Epub 2022 Jan 29.

Authors

Gustavo A Viani¹, Andre G Gouveia², Fernando K Matsuura³, Alexandre A Jacinto⁴, Fabio Y Moraes⁵

Affiliations

¹ Ribeirão Preto Medical School, Department of Medical Imagings, Hematology and Oncology of University of São Paulo (FMRP-USP), Brazil. Electronic address: gaviani@hcrp.usp.br.
² Radiation Oncology Department - Américas Centro de Oncologia Integrado, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
³ Department of Medical Imagings, Hematology and Oncology of University of São Paulo (FMRP-USP), Brazil.
⁴ Radiation Oncology Department, Hospital de Amor, Barretos, Brazil.
⁵ Department of Oncology - Division of Radiation Oncology, Kingston General Hospital, Queen's University, Kingston, Canada.

PMID: 35101470
DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2022.01.032

Abstract

Objectives: Assess Once daily (OD) chemoradiation effectiveness for LS-SCLC compared with twice daily (BID) chemoradiation.

Methods and materials: Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guideline, eligible randomized clinical trials (RCT) comparing OD and BID were identified on electronic databases. A meta-analysis was performed to compare overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and toxicity. A metaregression analysis was conducted to explore the influence of fractionation, biological effective dose (BED), the proportion of patients treated with prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI), elective nodal irradiation (ENI), and the start of radiotherapy (week 1 or week 4).

Results: Five RCTs with a total of 1941 patients (OD vs. BID) were included. The relative risk (RR) for OS and PFS was 0.97 (CI95% 0.8-1.1, p = 0.731) and 0.90 (CI95% 0.7-1.1, p = 0.20) at 3-years. In the metaregression analysis, hypofractionated radiotherapy schedules were associated with an improvement in overall survival (p = 0.03). The start of radiotherapy (W1 or W4), BED, and ENI had no significant effect on OS and PFS. The complete response rate partial response and overall response rate for BID vs OD were 40% vs. 33% (p = 0.97), 50% vs. 57% (p = 0.94), and 89% vs. 93% (p = 0.99). The rate of completed planned RT 96% vs. 94% (p = 0.66), and the % of ≥4 chemotherapy cycles received 74% vs. 74% (p = 0.99), did not differ between OD and BID. The local and distant failure rates were not significantly different between OD and BID 40% vs. 33% (p = 0.88) and 36% vs. 36% (p = 0.99). No difference in grade 2 or grade 3 pneumonitis and esophagitis was observed among the groups (p = NS).

Conclusion: For LS-SCLC, OD conventional chemoradiation results in similar outcomes to BID chemoradiation. In contrast, hypofractionated radiotherapy was associated with a better OS and PFS than BID. Additional randomized phase III trials exploring hypofractionation with systemic therapy are warranted to validate our findings.

Keywords: Hyperfractionated radiotherapy; Limited stage; Once-daily radiotherapy; Overall survival; Small cell lung cancer.

Publication types

Meta-Analysis

MeSH terms

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols / therapeutic use
Chemoradiotherapy / adverse effects
Humans
Lung Neoplasms* / drug therapy
Lung Neoplasms* / radiotherapy
Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
Small Cell Lung Carcinoma* / drug therapy
Small Cell Lung Carcinoma* / radiotherapy