Use of Diagnosis Codes to Find Blood Transfusion Adverse Events in Electronic Health Records

J Patient Saf. 2022 Aug 1;18(5):e823-e866. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000946. Epub 2022 Feb 23.

Abstract

Objective: Electronic health records (EHRs) and big data tools offer the opportunity for surveillance of adverse events (patient harm associated with medical care). We used International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, codes in electronic records to identify known, and potentially novel, adverse reactions to blood transfusion.

Methods: We used 49,331 adult admissions involving critical care at a major teaching hospital, 2001-2012, in the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care III EHRs database. We formed a T (defined as packed red blood cells, platelets, or plasma) group of 21,443 admissions versus 25,468 comparison (C) admissions. The International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification , diagnosis codes were compared for T versus C, described, and tested with statistical tools.

Results: Transfusion adverse events (TAEs) such as transfusion-associated circulatory overload (TACO; 12 T cases; rate ratio [RR], 15.61; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.49-98) were found. There were also potential TAEs similar to TAEs, such as fluid overload disorder (361 T admissions; RR, 2.24; 95% CI, 1.88-2.65), similar to TACO. Some diagnoses could have been sequelae of TAEs, including nontraumatic compartment syndrome of abdomen (52 T cases; RR, 6.76; 95% CI, 3.40-14.9) possibly being a consequence of TACO.

Conclusions: Surveillance for diagnosis codes that could be TAE sequelae or unrecognized TAE might be useful supplements to existing medical product adverse event programs.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
  • Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Blood Transfusion
  • Electronic Health Records*
  • Humans
  • Risk Factors
  • Transfusion Reaction* / epidemiology