Histological Evaluation of Products of Conception, Who Benefits from It?

Fetal Pediatr Pathol. 2023 Feb;42(1):30-43. doi: 10.1080/15513815.2022.2053916. Epub 2022 Mar 24.

Abstract

Background: Histopathological evaluation of the first trimester pregnancy loss has always been controversial. Although it is recommended, it is not a part of guidelines.Methods: Six hundred eighty-six samples in a referral infertility clinic were evaluated microscopically and categorized. Two hundred ninety-five cases were evaluated by genetic methods (Multiplex Ligation-dependent Probe Amplification).Results: From 569 samples with chorionic villi, 361 cases had history of three or more abortions. 18.3% of this group showed chronic intervillous of unknown etiology (CIUE) and 8.3% revealed intervilli fibrin deposition, both pathologies with a high risk of recurrence. History of a live child was significantly higher in CIUE group. 29% of genetically evaluated cases had a chromosomal abnormality.Conclusion: Histological evaluation of recurrent pregnancy loss could illuminate the cause of abortion in relatively acceptable percentage of cases, especially in mothers with higher number of previous abortion, mothers with a history of live child and in referral centers.

Keywords: General genetics; placental pathology; recurrent pregnancy loss.

MeSH terms

  • Abortion, Habitual* / genetics
  • Abortion, Spontaneous* / pathology
  • Child
  • Chorionic Villi / pathology
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Placenta Diseases* / pathology
  • Pregnancy
  • Pregnancy Trimester, First
  • Retrospective Studies