Robot-assisted radical cystectomy with intracorporeal urinary diversion (iRARC) is increasingly being performed instead of open surgery. A criticism of this technique is the long learning curve, but limited data are available on this topic. At our center, the transition from open radical cystectomy (ORC) to iRARC began in May 2017. A retrospective analysis was conducted on the initial 53 cases of robot-assisted cystectomy with intracorporeal urinary diversion via ileal conduit, which were performed by one single surgeon. The patients were divided into four consecutive groups according to the surgeon's increasing experience, and perioperative parameters were analyzed as a surrogate for the learning curve. Over the course of the learning curve, a decline in median operation time from 415 to 361 min (p = 0.02), blood loss from 400 to 200 mL (p = 0.01), and minor complications from 71% to 15% (p = 0.02) was observed. No significant difference in overall and major complications, length of hospital stay, and total lymph node yield was shown. During the initial period of the learning curve, only the less complex cases were operated on using robotic surgery, while the more challenging ones were handled through open surgery. After experience with 28 cases, no more cystectomies were performed through open surgery. This led to an increase in operation time and length of hospital stay, as well as a higher incidence of both minor and overall complications among cases 28-40. After 40 cases, a significant decrease in these parameters was observed again. Our analysis demonstrated that operation time, blood loss, and minor complications decrease with increasing surgical experience in iRARC, while suggesting that technically challenging cases should be operated on after experience with 40 robotic cystectomies.
Keywords: bladder cancer; intracorporeal urinary diversion; learning curve; radical cystectomy; robotics.