Utility of the Stanford Integrated Psychosocial Assessment for Transplant in predicting outcomes before and after lung transplantation

Abstract

Background: Optimizing donor use and achieving maximal survival following lung transplantation (LTx) require a pretransplant assessment that identifies clinical, physiological, and psychosocial patient factors associated with both poor and optimal post-LTx survival. We examined the utility of a psychosocial tool, the Stanford Integrated Psychosocial Assessment for Transplant (SIPAT), to identify patient suitability for LTx, as well as its association with clinical outcomes before and after LTx.

Methods: This was a retrospective single-center study analyzing LTx assessment clinical variables (age, gender, diagnosis, functional capacity, nutrition, renal function), with a particular focus on the utility of the SIPAT score, to predict patient suitability for LTx. The same variables were analyzed against LTx waitlist mortality, as well as post-LTx survival.

Results: Over an 8-year period dating from December 2012, 914 patients (male 54.4%, mean age 55.2 years) underwent LTx assessment. Patients declined for LTx (n = 152, 16.6%) were older and had reduced functional capacity, nutritional markers, and renal function but had a higher SIPAT score. Once listed for LTx, a higher SIPAT score was not associated with waitlist mortality or reduced post-LTx survival.

Conclusions: The SIPAT tool measures psychosocial suitability for transplantation that can be incorporated into a standardized assessment of LTx suitability. While patients with higher SIPAT score were more likely to be declined for LTx, the SIPAT score did not predict outcome in transplanted patients. A subgroup of patients with high SIPAT scores were successfully transplanted, suggesting that unfavorable psychosocial variables are potentially modifiable with a well-resourced multidisciplinary LTx team.

Keywords: Chronic rejection; Lung transplantation; Outcomes; Psychosocial; Recipient; Survival.