Insights into the differences related to the resistance mechanisms to the highly toxic fruit Hippomane mancinella (Malpighiales: Euphorbiaceae) between the larvae of the sister species Anastrepha acris and Anastrepha ludens (Diptera: Tephritidae) through comparative transcriptomics

Front Physiol. 2024 Jan 18:15:1263475. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2024.1263475. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

The Manchineel, Hippomane mancinella ("Death Apple Tree") is one of the most toxic fruits worldwide and nevertheless is the host plant of the monophagous fruit fly species Anastrepha acris (Diptera: Tephritidae). Here we aimed at elucidating the detoxification mechanisms in larvae of A. acris reared on a diet enriched with the toxic fruit (6% lyophilizate) through comparative transcriptomics. We compared the performance of A. acris larvae with that of the sister species A. ludens, a highly polyphagous pest species that is unable to infest H. mancinella in nature. The transcriptional alterations in A. ludens were significantly greater than in A. acris. We mainly found two resistance mechanisms in both species: structural, activating cuticle protein biosynthesis (chitin-binding proteins likely reducing permeability to toxic compounds in the intestine), and metabolic, triggering biosynthesis of serine proteases and xenobiotic metabolism activation by glutathione-S-transferases and cytochrome P450 oxidoreductase. Some cuticle proteins and serine proteases were not orthologous between both species, suggesting that in A. acris, a structural resistance mechanism has been selected allowing specialization to the highly toxic host plant. Our results represent a nice example of how two phylogenetically close species diverged over recent evolutionary time related to resistance mechanisms to plant secondary metabolites.

Keywords: Anastrepha acris; Anastrepha ludens; Diptera: Tephritidae; Herbivory; Hippomane mancinella; detoxification mechanisms; transcriptomics.

Grants and funding

The author(s) declare financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. This work was funded by grants to MA from the Campaña Nacional Contra Moscas de la Fruta via an Agreement between the Consejo Nacional Consultivo Fitosanitario (CONACOFI) and INECOL (Project Numbers 41013–2019, 80124–2020 and 80147–2021). Additional funds in the form of salaries as well as research facilities and equipment were provided by INECOL to MA and EIL.