Assessment of pelvic organ prolapse with the Pelvic Inclination Correction System: defining the normal range and threshold to pathology

Abdom Radiol (NY). 2024 Mar 13. doi: 10.1007/s00261-024-04222-x. Online ahead of print.

Abstract

Purpose: To define the normal range and threshold values for pathologic prolapse on MRI using the PICS line and assess its correlation with the pubococcygeal line (PCL).

Methods: This prospective, IRB-approved study included 20 nulliparous volunteers and 18 prolapse patients (POP-Q Stage ≥ 2). Organ positions (bladder, cervix, anorectal junction) relative to PICS and PCL were measured on dynamic MRI. Differences in organ position were compared. Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed to identify cutoff values for prolapse using the PICS line. The correlation between PICS and PCL measurements was tested with Spearman's rank correlation.

Results: In volunteers, median bladder and cervix positions measured to the PICS at rest were - 2.7 cm and - 5.3 cm compared to - 1.9 cm and - 2.7 cm in patients (p < 0.001). During straining, bladder and cervix were at - 0.9 cm and - 3.2 cm in volunteers versus + 2.5 cm and + 2.5 cm in patients (p < 0.001). Correlation was strong for PICS and PCL measurements for all three compartments (δ = 0.883-0.970, p ≤ 0.001). AUCs of PICS for the anterior and middle compartment were 0.98 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.96-1.00, p < 0.001) and 0.96 (95% CI 0.89-1.00, p < 0.001) for differentiating patients from healthy volunteers. AUC for the posterior compartment was 0.76 (95% CI 0.57-0.96, p = 0.034).

Conclusion: PICS measurements reliably differentiate patients from volunteers in the anterior and middle compartment. Future studies need to identify a reliable threshold for the posterior compartment. PICS and PCL measurements are strongly correlated.

Keywords: Diagnostic imaging; Magnetic resonance imaging; Pelvic floor disorders; Pelvic organ prolapse.