Childhood cancer survivors have a higher risk of developing cardiomyopathy than members of the general population. Screening echocardiograms can facilitate early detection and treatment of cardiomyopathy. Furthermore, motivational interviewing can increase uptake of cardiac screening. However, such approaches are time- and resource-intensive, which limits their reach to the survivors who need them. We describe how we utilized a user-centered design process to translate an in-person motivational interviewing intervention into an eHealth tool to improve cardiac screening among childhood cancer survivors. We used an iterative, three-phase, user-centered design approach: (i) setting the stage (convening advisory boards and reviewing the original intervention), (ii) content programming and development (writing and programming intervention text and flow), and (iii) intervention testing (research team testing and cognitive interviews.) For cognitive interviews, participants were recruited via institutional participant registries and medical records. Data were analyzed using rapid qualitative analysis. During Phase 1, we identified survivor and provider advisors and outlined elements of the in-person intervention to change for the eHealth tool. During Phases 2 and 3, advisors recommended several modifications that guided the final intervention content and flow. Examples include: acknowledging potential hesitation or apprehension surrounding medical screenings, addressing barriers and facilitators to obtaining screening, and improving the tool's usability and appeal. In Phase 3, cognitive interview participants suggested additional refinements to the intervention language. This translation process shows that continued in-depth engagement of community advisors and iterative testing can improve the applicability of an eHealth to survivors' lived experiences and social contexts.
Keywords: cancer; cancer survivorship; cardiac screening; childhood cancer; eHealth; motivational interviewing.
Childhood cancer survivors have a higher-than-average risk for developing heart damage compared to the general population. One-on-one interviews aimed at educating survivors about the importance of screening for heart damage can increase engagement in screening, but these programs are often too resource-intensive to be made available to large groups of survivors. Programs delivered using digital technology, like websites and smartphone apps, can be a more accessible alternative. In this article, we describe how we translated an in-person counseling program into a digital tool. We convened advisors who were childhood cancer survivors and healthcare providers to review the tool throughout the three-phase translation process: (i) setting the stage (convening advisory boards and reviewing original intervention), (ii) content programming and development (writing, and programming intervention text and flow), and (iii) intervention testing (research team testing and cognitive interviews.). Our translation process shows that continuously engaging with advisory boards and testing apps with participants can improve health programs in line with communities’ diverse perspectives.
© Society of Behavioral Medicine 2024. All rights reserved. For commercial re-use, please contact reprints@oup.com for reprints and translation rights for reprints. All other permissions can be obtained through our RightsLink service via the Permissions link on the article page on our site—for further information please contact journals.permissions@oup.com.