The present experiments were carried out to elucidate whether pharmacological nature of caffeine (1 mM)-induced endothelium-dependent contraction (EDC) is different from that of caffeine (10 mM)-induced endothelium-independent contraction (EIC) in canine mesenteric artery. Caffeine (1 mM)-induced EDC was abolished when arterial strips were incubated in Ca(++)-free medium for 20 min, but EIC was not abolished. EGTA and EDTA (0.5 and 1 mM) attenuated the EDC, and at the concentration of 2.5 mM completely abolished the EDC. Nifedipine (10(-6) and 3 x 10(-6) M), diltiazem (10(-6) M) and verapamil (10(-6) M) did not affect the caffeine (1 mM)-induced EDC. Lemakalim (10(-8), 3 x 10(-8) and 10(-7) M) attenuated the caffeine (1 mM)-induced EDC in a concentration-dependent manner. Lemakalim (10(-7) M) nearly abolished the EDC. The inhibitory effect of lemakalim (10(-7) M) on the EDC was antagonized in the presence of glibenclamide (3 x 10(-6) M). In contrast, caffeine (10 mM)-induced EIC was resistant to lemakalim at higher concentration (3 x 10(-7) M). Forskolin (10(-7), 3 x 10(-7) and 10(-6) M) significantly attenuated both the caffeine (1 mM)-induced EDC and caffeine (10 mM)-induced EIC. The inhibitory effect of forskolin on the EDC was augmented in the presence of rolipram (10(-6) M). Nitroglycerin (10(-5) M) attenuated significantly caffeine-induced both EDC and EIC. The inhibitory effect of nitroglycerin on the EDC was augmented in the presence of zaprinast (10(-5) M). The present experiments demonstrate that caffeine-induced EDC is due to nifedipine-resistant and lemakalim-sensitive Ca++ mobilization and the EIC is due to both nifedipine- and lemakalim-resistant Ca++ mobilization in canine mesenteric artery.