Ability of MBP or RBP signal peptides to influence folding and in vitro translocation of wild-type and hybrid precursors

FEBS Lett. 1994 Aug 1;349(2):281-5. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(94)00684-9.

Abstract

Maltose-binding protein (MBP), whose export in E. coli is dependent upon the chaperone SecB, and ribose-binding protein (RBP), whose export is SecB-independent, have been used to generate hybrid secretory proteins. Here, in vitro techniques were used to analyze MBP, RBP, RBP-MBP (RBP signal and MBP mature), and MBP-RBP (MBP signal and RBP mature). In protease-protection experiments, RBP folded considerably faster than MBP, RBP-MBP, or MBP-RBP. Only the folding properties of proteins containing the MBP mature moiety were influenced by SecB. In post-translational translocation assays, MBP exhibited the highest translocation efficiency. The hybrids RBP-MBP and MBP-RBP showed intermediate levels, and RBP translocation was not detected in these assays. These experiments demonstrate the influence of the signal peptide in determining folding properties and translocation efficiency of precursor secretory proteins.

MeSH terms

  • ATP-Binding Cassette Transporters*
  • Bacterial Proteins / metabolism
  • Biological Transport
  • Carrier Proteins / metabolism*
  • Escherichia coli Proteins*
  • Maltose / metabolism
  • Maltose-Binding Proteins
  • Monosaccharide Transport Proteins*
  • Periplasmic Binding Proteins*
  • Protein Folding*
  • Protein Precursors / metabolism*
  • Protein Sorting Signals / metabolism*
  • Ribose / metabolism

Substances

  • ATP-Binding Cassette Transporters
  • Bacterial Proteins
  • Carrier Proteins
  • Escherichia coli Proteins
  • Maltose-Binding Proteins
  • Monosaccharide Transport Proteins
  • Periplasmic Binding Proteins
  • Protein Precursors
  • Protein Sorting Signals
  • RbsB protein, E coli
  • SecB protein, Bacteria
  • maltose transport system, E coli
  • Ribose
  • Maltose